Editorial: What Makes for a Great Applications and Case Studies Paper?

Michael L. Stein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2023.2173458

IF: 4.369

2023-04-07

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract:One of the most common reasons a submission to JASA Applications and Case Studies is rejected is that it is deemed inappropriate for this section of the journal. If we look for guidance in the journal's instructions for authors, the opening sentence of the section on Applications and Case Studies states, "The Applications and Case Studies section publishes original articles that cogently demonstrate statistical usage in applications from any research area." In contrast, the instructions for Theory and Methods papers say, "The research reported should be motivated by a scientific or practical problem and, ideally, illustrated by application of the proposed methodology to that problem. Illustration of techniques with real data is especially welcomed and strongly encouraged." Many potential authors may find the distinctions between these two statements difficult to discern, which perhaps partly explains the high frequency of submissions rejected for being inappropriate. This editorial is an attempt to clarify what I think these distinctions are. In particular, in what ways is a paper with new methodology motivated by a "scientific or practical problem" and illustrated with "real data" not necessarily appropriate for Applications and Case Studies?

statistics & probability