Abstract:Homotopy limits and colimits are homotopical replacements for the usual limits and colimits of category theory, which can be approached either using classical explicit constructions or the modern abstract machinery of derived functors. Our first goal in this paper is expository: we explain both approaches and a proof of their equivalence. Our second goal is to generalize this result to enriched categories and homotopy weighted limits, showing that the classical explicit constructions still give the right answer in the abstract sense. This result partially bridges the gap between classical homotopy theory and modern abstract homotopy theory. To do this we introduce a notion of "enriched homotopical categories", which are more general than enriched model categories, but are still a good place to do enriched homotopy theory. This demonstrates that the presence of enrichment often simplifies rather than complicates matters, and goes some way toward achieving a better understanding of "the role of homotopy in homotopy theory."
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are the definitions of homotopy limits and homotopy colimits and their generalizations in enriched categories. Specifically, the article aims to:
1. **Explain different definitions of homotopy limits and homotopy colimits and their equivalence**: The article first introduces two different methods to define homotopy limits and homotopy colimits. One is the classical explicit construction method, and the other is the modern abstract derived functor method. The author explains these two methods in detail and proves their equivalence.
2. **Generalize these results to enriched categories and weighted homotopy limits**: The author further explores how to generalize these results to enriched categories and introduces the concept of "enriched homotopy category". In this way, the author shows that the classical explicit construction method still gives the correct answer in an abstract sense, thus partially bridging the gap between classical homotopy theory and modern abstract homotopy theory.
3. **Show that the enrichment structure simplifies rather than complicates the problem**: The article emphasizes that the enrichment structure usually simplifies rather than complicates the problems in homotopy theory, which helps to better understand "the role of homotopy in homotopy theory".
### Specific problem description
- **Instability of homotopy limits and homotopy colimits**: In a category with homotopy theory, ordinary limits and colimits are usually not homotopy - friendly, that is, they do not keep homotopy equivalence invariant. Therefore, alternative constructions, called homotopy limits and homotopy colimits, need to be found.
- **Unification of different definitions**: There are two natural ways to define homotopy limits: one is based on the explicit construction method, and the other is based on the global definition of derived functors. One of the goals of the article is to prove that these two definitions are equivalent in the homotopy sense.
- **Generalization in enriched categories**: To deal with more complex mathematical structures, the article further considers homotopy limits and homotopy colimits in enriched categories and introduces the concept of enriched weighted homotopy limits.
### Main contributions
- **Bridging the gap between classical and modern homotopy theory**: By introducing the concept of enriched homotopy category, the article partially bridges the gap between classical homotopy theory and modern abstract homotopy theory.
- **Showing the advantages of the enrichment structure**: The article shows the advantages of the enrichment structure in homotopy theory, indicating that it usually simplifies rather than complicates the problem.
- **Providing detailed comparison and proof**: The article provides detailed comparison and proof, shows the equivalence of the two definition methods, and provides a clear understanding path for readers.
In summary, the main goal of this paper is to explain and unify different definitions of homotopy limits and homotopy colimits and generalize them to enriched categories, thus providing new perspectives and tools for the study of homotopy theory.