Abstract:Abstract Motivation The rapid development of spatial transcriptomics (ST) approaches has provided new insights into understanding tissue architecture and function. However, the gene expressions measured at a spot may contain contributions from multiple cells due to the low-resolution of current ST technologies. Although many computational methods have been developed to disentangle discrete cell types from spatial mixtures, the community lacks a thorough evaluation of the performance of those deconvolution methods. Results Here, we present a comprehensive benchmarking of 14 deconvolution methods on four datasets. Furthermore, we investigate the robustness of different methods to sequencing depth, spot size and the choice of normalization. Moreover, we propose a new ensemble learning-based deconvolution method (EnDecon) by integrating multiple individual methods for more accurate deconvolution. The major new findings include: (i) cell2loction, RCTD and spatialDWLS are more accurate than other ST deconvolution methods, based on the evaluation of three metrics: RMSE, PCC and JSD; (ii) cell2location and spatialDWLS are more robust to the variation of sequencing depth than RCTD; (iii) the accuracy of the existing methods tends to decrease as the spot size becomes smaller; (iv) most deconvolution methods perform best when they normalize ST data using the method described in their original papers; and (v) the integrative method, EnDecon, could achieve more accurate ST deconvolution. Our study provides valuable information and guideline for practically applying ST deconvolution tools and developing new and more effective methods. Availability and implementation The benchmarking pipeline is available at https://github.com/SunXQlab/ST-deconvoulution. An R package for EnDecon is available at https://github.com/SunXQlab/EnDecon. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Benchmarking spatial and single-cell transcriptomics integration methods for transcript distribution prediction and cell type deconvolution

A comprehensive benchmarking with practical guidelines for cellular deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics

Benchmarking and integration of methods for deconvoluting spatial transcriptomic data

Benchmarking cell-type clustering methods for spatially resolved transcriptomics data

Benchmarking Computational Integration Methods for Spatial Transcriptomics Data

Benchmarking deep learning methods for biologically conserved single-cell integration

Benchmarking algorithms for single-cell multi-omics prediction and integration

Spatial-ID: a cell typing method for spatially resolved transcriptomics via transfer learning and spatial embedding

Benchmarking clustering, alignment, and integration methods for spatial transcriptomics

A comprehensive comparison on cell-type composition inference for spatial transcriptomics data

Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics enables probabilistic inference of cell type topography

Deconvolution algorithms for inference of the cell-type composition of the spatial transcriptome

Spotless, a reproducible pipeline for benchmarking cell type deconvolution in spatial transcriptomics

Spotless: a reproducible pipeline for benchmarking cell type deconvolution in spatial transcriptomics

NLSDeconv: an efficient cell-type deconvolution method for spatial transcriptomics data

Advances in mixed cell deconvolution enable quantification of cell types in spatial transcriptomic data

Benchmarking algorithms for spatially variable gene identification in spatial transcriptomics

Deep Learning in Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Data Analysis: Advances and Challenges from a Data Science Perspective

EnDecon: cell type deconvolution of spatially resolved transcriptomics data via ensemble learning

Benchmarking Spatial Clustering Methods with Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Data

Benchmarking second-generation methods for cell-type deconvolution of transcriptomic data