Abstract:With the advent of multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and in situ RNA sequencing technologies, spatial transcriptomics analysis is advancing rapidly, providing spatial location and gene expression information about cells in tissue sections at single cell resolution. Cell type classification of these spatially-resolved cells can be inferred by matching the spatial transcriptomics data to reference atlases derived from single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) in which cell types are defined by differences in their gene expression profiles. However, robust cell type matching of the spatially-resolved cells to reference scRNA-seq atlases is challenging due to the intrinsic differences in resolution between the spatial and scRNA-seq data. In this study, we systematically evaluated six computational algorithms for cell type matching across four image-based spatial transcriptomics experimental protocols (MERFISH, smFISH, BaristaSeq, and ExSeq) conducted on the same mouse primary visual cortex (VISp) brain region. We find that many cells are assigned as the same type by multiple cell type matching algorithms and are present in spatial patterns previously reported from scRNA-seq studies in VISp. Furthermore, by combining the results of individual matching strategies into consensus cell type assignments, we see even greater alignment with biological expectations. We present two ensemble meta-analysis strategies used in this study and share the consensus cell type matching results in the Cytosplore Viewer (https://viewer.cytosplore.org) for interactive visualization and data exploration. The consensus matching can also guide spatial data analysis using SSAM, allowing segmentation-free cell type assignment.

Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics enables probabilistic inference of cell type topography

Celloscope: a probabilistic model for marker-gene-driven cell type deconvolution in spatial transcriptomics data

Cell2location maps fine-grained cell types in spatial transcriptomics

The promise of spatial transcriptomics for neuroscience in the era of molecular cell typing

Advances in mixed cell deconvolution enable quantification of cell types in spatial transcriptomic data

Latent Space Inference For Spatial Transcriptomics

Joint cell type identification in spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA sequencing data

Reference-based cell type matching of spatial transcriptomics data

Comprehensive mapping of tissue cell architecture via integrated single cell and spatial transcriptomics

Multiscale topology classifies and quantifies cell types in subcellular spatial transcriptomics

A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Modeling and Inferring Spatial Transcriptomic Data

Cell Type Assignments for Spatial Transcriptomics Data

What Do You Most Hope Spatial Molecular Profiling Will Help Us Understand? Part 1

Discovering Neuronal Cell Types and Their Gene Expression Profiles Using a Spatial Point Process Mixture Model

FISHFactor: A Probabilistic Factor Model for Spatial Transcriptomics Data with Subcellular Resolution

TISSUE: uncertainty-calibrated prediction of single-cell spatial transcriptomics improves downstream analyses

Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics

Profiling cell identity and tissue architecture with single-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Reference-based cell type matching of in situ image-based spatial transcriptomics data on primary visual cortex of mouse brain

Embryo-scale, single-cell spatial transcriptomics