Structural (B1 to B8) Phase Transition in MnO under Pressure: Comparison of All-electron and Pseudopotential Approaches

Jindrich Kolorenc,Lubos Mitas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.235118

2006-12-14

Abstract:We employ the density functional theory to study a structural transition of MnO from B1 (rocksalt) to B8 (NiAs) structures that was observed experimentally at pressures around 100 GPa. We utilize all-electron description as well as norm-conserving pseudopotentials and demonstrate that these two approaches can significantly differ in quantitative predictions. We explicitly show that even small-core pseudopotentials exhibit transferability inaccuracies for quantities sensitive to the energy differences between high- and low-spin polarizations of valence electrons.

Strongly Correlated Electrons,Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: during the phase transition process of manganese dioxide (MnO) from B1 (rock - salt structure) to B8 (NiAs structure) under high - pressure conditions, the differences between different electronic description methods (all - electron method and pseudopotential method) and their impacts on the prediction results. Specifically:

1. **Research Background**:
- The properties of transition metal oxides (such as MnO) under high - pressure conditions have always been a research hotspot in the field of condensed matter physics.
- The local density approximation (LDA) or generalized gradient approximation (GGA) in density functional theory (DFT) has deficiencies in describing these materials, especially under high - pressure conditions.

2. **Research Problems**:
- MnO will undergo a phase transition from B1 structure to B8 structure at a pressure of about 100 GPa, accompanied by the collapse of the local magnetic moment and the transition of the electronic structure from insulator to metal.
- The author uses two methods, all - electron description and Vanderbilt - conserved pseudopotential, to study this phase transition and finds that there are significant differences in quantitative prediction between these two methods.
- Specific problems include:
- Are the predictions of different methods for the structural phase transition of MnO under high pressure consistent?
- Is the Vanderbilt - conserved pseudopotential reliable in describing the changes in the electronic structure under high - pressure conditions?
- What is the impact of the core - electron treatment method on the high - pressure phase transition prediction?

3. **Research Motivation**:
- Provide additional benchmark tests to evaluate the ability of different computational methods to describe the electronic structure of MnO under high - pressure conditions.
- Explore the interaction between core electrons and valence electrons, especially during the high - pressure phase transition process.
- Provide a reference for the application of advanced computational methods such as quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the pseudopotential.

4. **Main Conclusions**:
- The study finds that even small - core pseudopotentials will show transfer in inaccuracies in some sensitive quantities (such as the energy difference between high - spin and low - spin polarizations).
- Under high - pressure conditions, the differences between the pseudopotential method and the all - electron method are significant, especially for phenomena involving local magnetic moment changes.
- The introduction of hybrid functionals (such as PBE0) can significantly reduce these differences and make the prediction results closer to experimental observations.

Through these studies, the author hopes to reveal the applicability and limitations of different electronic description methods under high - pressure conditions and provide guidance for future theoretical calculations and experimental research.