Comment on "Roentgen quantum phase shift: a semiclassical local electrodynamical effect?"

S. C. Tiwari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.248903

2005-08-30

Abstract:In this short note we amplify our comments on the paper PRL 95,010405 (2005).

General Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment on “Ground-State Description of Quasi-One-dimensional Polarons with Arbitrary Electron-Phonon Coupling Strength”

QH Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.11077

IF: 3.7

1999-01-01

Physical Review B

Abstract:It is shown that the main result presented by Ercelebi and Senger [Phys. Rev. B $53$, 11 008 (1996)] is unreasonable, and is only an artifact produced by a variational scheme rather than an intrinsic property of the system.
Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

YQ LI,ZM SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/384

1995-01-01

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.
Comment on 'Single-slit electron diffraction with Aharonov-Bohm phase: Feynman's thought experiment with quantum point contacts'

S C Tiwari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.158901

2014-03-26

Abstract:We comment on the paper published in PRL 112, 010403 (2014).

General Physics
Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Dhiraj Sinha,Gehan A. J. Amaratunga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.119701

IF: 8.6

2015-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract: Recently published paper [PRL 114, 147701 (2015)] contains several misleading statements and misinterpretations of known facts. The main massage of the paper [PRL 114, 147701 (2015)] is as follows: "We have shown that explicit symmetry breaking in the structural configuration of charges leads to symmetry breaking of the electric field which results in electromagnetic radiation due to non-conservative current within a localized region of space and time" seems to transcend mere empiricism, touching the theoretical foundations of electromagnetism. Moreover, basic mistakes are numerous in this article and its main claim is wrong. Below we prove it citing the paper and arguing against it.
Reply to Comment on "Quantum Force in a Superconductor"

A.V.Nikulov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0304313

2003-04-14

Abstract:A reply is made to Comment by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://D.P.Sheehan" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> in which he takes notice that the quantum force introduced in my earlier paper <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://A.V.Nikulov" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, Phys. Rev. B 64, 012505 (2001) challenges to the absolute status of the second law of thermodynamics. It is shown that the introduction of the quantum force explains only an experimental challenge to the second law. The observation of the persistent current at non-zero resistance R > 0 is experimental evidence of violation of the postulate saving the second law in the beginning of the 20 century. According to this postulate any Brownian motion is absolutely random whereas the persistent current at R > 0 is a regulated Brownian motion.

Superconductivity,Statistical Mechanics
Reply to 'Comment on "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes"'

B. Amorim,R. Roldán,E. Cappelluti,F. Guinea,A. Fasolino,M. I. Katsnelson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.176302

2014-10-09

Abstract:In this note, we reply to the comment made by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://E.I.Kats" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> and <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://V.V.Lebedev" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4298" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4298">arXiv:1407.4298</a>] on our recent work "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes" [Phys. Rev. B 89, 224307 (2014)]. Kats and Lebedev question the validity of the calculation presented in our work, in particular on the use of a Debye momentum as a ultra-violet regulator for the theory. We address and counter argue the criticisms made by Kats and Lebedev to our work.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics,Statistical Mechanics
Resolution of the Solar Neutrino Anomaly

Maurice Dubin,Robert K. Soberman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9604074

1996-04-15

Abstract:The solar neutrino anomaly, measurements discrepant from predictions of the Standard Solar Model, has existed for over 30 years. Multiple experiments measuring fluxes from several reactions in the hydrogen fusion chain have added to the puzzle. Each of the several elements of the enigma are resolved by recognition of measurements establishing that most of the sun's fusion must occur near the surface rather than the core.

Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Comment on "Reversibility of magnetic field driven transition from electronic phase separation state to single-phase state in manganites: A microscopic view"

R. Rawat,V G. Sathe,P. Chaddah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.06345

2017-12-18

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Abstract:It is a comment on a paper titled "Reversibility of magnetic field driven transition from electronic phase separation state to single-phase state in manganites: A microscopic view" by Liu et al. Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 195154.
Some Comments on the Note "comment on 'Single-Parameter Quantum Charge and Spin Pumping in Armchair Graphene Nanoribbons' by Zhu and Berakdar (Arxiv:1207.3457)"

Y. Zhou,M. W. Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1207.4365

2012-01-01

Abstract:In response to the comment by Zhu and Berakdar (arXiv:1207.3457) that the physical system considered by them in their previous work [Ding et al., PRB 84, 115433 (2011)] is conceptually different from ours in the appendix of our latest paper [Zhou and Wu, arXiv:1206.3435], we show why they are relevant and further point out conceptually the problems in their work. We also point out that the main supporting arguments in their comment are incorrect.
Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

T. P. Xiong,L. L. Yan,F. Zhou,K. Rehan,D. F. Liang,L. Chen,W. L. Yang,Z. H. Ma,M. Feng,V. Vedral

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.02392

2018-08-05

Abstract:Here we respond to a comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>] submitted recently on 'Experimental Verification of a Jarzynski-Related Information-Theoretic Equality by a Single Trapped Ion' PRL 120 010601 (2018). We consider that the argument is the thermalization in a quantum system, which is different from the counterpart in conventional thermodynamics.

Quantum Physics
Reply to Comment on "Space-Time Crystals of Trapped Ions"

Tongcang Li,Zhe-Xuan Gong,Zhang-Qi Yin,H. T. Quan,Xiaobo Yin,Peng Zhang,L. -M. Duan,Xiang Zhang

2013-01-01

Abstract: This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).
Reply to comment in arXiv:1802.01382

T. P. Xiong,L. L. Yan,F. Zhou,K. Rehan,D. F. Liang,L. Chen,W. L. Yang,Z. H. Ma,M. Feng,V. Vedral

2018-01-01

Abstract:Here we respond to a comment [arXiv:1802.01382] submitted recently on 'Experimental Verification of a Jarzynski-Related Information-Theoretic Equality by a Single Trapped Ion' PRL 120 010601 (2018). We consider that the argument is the thermalization in a quantum system, which is different from the counterpart in conventional thermodynamics.
Comment on "Quantum trapping and rotational self-alignment in triangular Casimir microcavities"

Zhentao Zhang

2024-06-19

Abstract:Küçüköz et al., Sci. Adv. 10, eadn1825 (2024) reported an experiment, which shows that conducting plates in the misaligned system separated by a liquid may experience transverse interactions at small separations. We point out that the effects might have been examined in detail in theoretical studies, New J. Phys. 24, 113036 (2022) and Phys. Lett. A 495, 129304 (2024).

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
Comment on "Wigner phase space description of a Morse oscillator'' [J. Chem. Phys. 77, 4604 (1982)]

Dimitris Kakofengitis,Maxime Oliva,Ole Steuernagel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.00772

2016-12-03

Abstract:Comment on ``Wigner phase space description of a Morse oscillator''

Quantum Physics,Chemical Physics
Comment on Quantum Interference between Light Sources Separated by 150 Million Kilometers Deng et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 080401 (2019)

Shaul Mukamel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.02376

2020-01-08

Abstract:This is a comment on the paper : Quantum Interference between Light Sources Separated by 150 Million Kilometers by Deng et al, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 080401 (2019)

Quantum Physics
Comment on "spatial Coherence and Optical Beam Shifts"

Li-Gang Wang,Shi-Yao Zhu,M. Suhail Zubairy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1304.5585

2013-01-01

Abstract:This comment is to show that our simulation data, based on our theory and method in Ref. [J. Phys. B 41, 055401 (2008)], are also in agreement with the experimental data presented for D_p-D_s in Ref. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 213901 (2012)]. We also demonstrate how to show the effect of spatial coherence on the GH shifts in this comment, therefore we disagree with the claims in Ref. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 213901 (2012)].
Comment on "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing"

Daniel A. Lidar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0308124

2003-08-22

Quantum Physics

Abstract:A Comment on the paper "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing" by R. Akis and D.K. Ferry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2823 (2001). The authors reply in Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2420 (2002).
Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Robert B. Griffiths

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202

2024-02-02

Abstract:This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2306.16756" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16756">arXiv:2306.16756</a> on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

Quantum Physics
Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Cyril Elouard,Camille Lombard Latune

2023-09-15

Abstract:In his Comment [1], Philip Strasberg (PS) argues from the analysis of different examples that the framework we have presented in [2] does not recover known results of macroscopic textbook thermodynamics. Here, we show that such apparent contradictions disappear when the necessary assumptions the aforementioned known results pre-suppose are applied. Those assumptions concern the control ability of the observer, the nature of the described degree of freedom, or the scale of the systems. The ability to relax those assumptions is precisely a motivation of our framework, which can explore the capacity of quantum systems to exchange work and heat even at scales not captured by textbook thermodynamics. We take the opportunity of this reply to further expand on the use of our framework and its connections with traditional thermodynamics.

Quantum Physics
Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Jiabin Yu,Christopher J. Ciccarino,Raffaello Bianco,Ion Errea,Prineha Narang,B. Andrei Bernevig

2023-06-07

Abstract:This is our reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling', <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2305.02340" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02340">arXiv:2305.02340</a>, J. Yu, C. J. Ciccarino, R. Bianco, I. Errea, P. Narang, B. A. Bernevig" by Prof. Pickett, which focuses on the MgB$_2$ part of our work. We show that the entirety of the criticism in Prof. Pickett's comment pertaining to our work (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2305.02340" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02340">arXiv:2305.02340</a>) is invalid.

Superconductivity

Comment on "Roentgen quantum phase shift: a semiclassical local electrodynamical effect?"

Comment on “Ground-State Description of Quasi-One-dimensional Polarons with Arbitrary Electron-Phonon Coupling Strength”

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

Comment on 'Single-slit electron diffraction with Aharonov-Bohm phase: Feynman's thought experiment with quantum point contacts'

Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Reply to Comment on "Quantum Force in a Superconductor"

Reply to 'Comment on "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes"'

Resolution of the Solar Neutrino Anomaly

Comment on "Reversibility of magnetic field driven transition from electronic phase separation state to single-phase state in manganites: A microscopic view"

Some Comments on the Note "comment on 'Single-Parameter Quantum Charge and Spin Pumping in Armchair Graphene Nanoribbons' by Zhu and Berakdar (Arxiv:1207.3457)"

Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

Reply to Comment on "Space-Time Crystals of Trapped Ions"

Reply to comment in arXiv:1802.01382

Comment on "Quantum trapping and rotational self-alignment in triangular Casimir microcavities"

Comment on "Wigner phase space description of a Morse oscillator'' [J. Chem. Phys. 77, 4604 (1982)]

Comment on Quantum Interference between Light Sources Separated by 150 Million Kilometers Deng et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 080401 (2019)

Comment on "spatial Coherence and Optical Beam Shifts"

Comment on "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing"

Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',