Branch dependence in the "consistent histories" approach to quantum mechanics

Thomas Müller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0506051

2006-11-13

Abstract:In the consistent histories formalism one specifies a family of histories as an exhaustive set of pairwise exclusive descriptions of the dynamics of a quantum system. We define branching families of histories, which strike a middle ground between the two available mathematically precise definitions of families of histories, viz., product families and Isham's history projector operator formalism. The former are too narrow for applications, and the latter's generality comes at a certain cost, barring an intuitive reading of the ``histories''. Branching families retain the intuitiveness of product families, they allow for the interpretation of a history's weight as a probability, and they allow one to distinguish two kinds of coarse-graining, leading to reconsidering the motivation for the consistency condition.

Quantum Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to define and understand "branching families of histories" in quantum mechanics. Specifically, the author aims to find a definition of a history family within the "consistent histories" framework that can both maintain intuitiveness and possess a certain degree of generality. The following is a detailed analysis of this problem:

### 1. **Background and Motivation**

In the consistent - histories approach in quantum mechanics, researchers describe the dynamic evolution of a closed quantum system through a series of possible histories. These histories are descriptions of the system's properties at different time points and must satisfy the conditions of mutual exclusivity and completeness. However, there are currently two main mathematical definitions: **product families** and **history projector operator formalism**. The former is too narrow, while the latter, although more general, has lost its intuitive interpretation.

### 2. **Core of the Problem**

The core problem of the paper is to propose a new definition - "branching families of histories" - to balance generality and intuitiveness. This definition should not only be able to represent a single - time description in a time series but also be able to handle more complex time - dependent relationships and allow for a probabilistic interpretation of historical weights.

### 3. **Specific Problems**

- **Precision of the Definition**: A formal definition is required to precisely describe the branching families of histories.
- **Probabilistic Interpretation**: Ensure that historical weights can be interpreted as probabilities.
- **Coarse - graining Problem**: Distinguish between two different types of coarse - graining and reconsider the role of the consistency condition.

### 4. **Solutions**

The author defines the branching - dependent history families by introducing the concept of **branching structure**. This method is based on branching temporal logic and constructs a finite history family through an inductive definition. The key points are:

- **Branching Structure**: A partially ordered set \( M \) is defined, where each node represents a moment and paths represent different histories.
- **Assignment of Time and Projection Operators**: Each node is associated with a time \( \tau(m) \) and a projection operator \( P(m) \), ensuring that the projection operators on different paths are orthogonal and complete.
- **Chain Operators and Weights**: The weight \( W(Y_\alpha) \) of each history is calculated through the chain operator \( K(Y_\alpha) \), and it is proven that the sum of these weights is 1.

### 5. **Conclusion**

In this way, the branching - dependent history families not only retain the intuitiveness of the product families but also possess a certain degree of generality, allowing for more complex dynamic descriptions. In addition, the author points out that the consistency condition should not be regarded as a prerequisite for introducing probabilities but rather as a requirement that there are no interference effects in the description of the system dynamics.

In summary, this paper solves the problem of how to expand the scope of application of the consistent - histories method while maintaining intuitiveness and provides a more flexible and extensive framework for understanding and applying quantum histories.