Abstract:In the histories formulation of quantum theory, sets of coarse-grained histories, that are called consistent, obey classical probability rules. It has been argued that these sets can describe the semi-classical behaviour of closed quantum systems. Most physical scenarios admit multiple different consistent sets and one can view each consistent set as a separate context. Using propositions from different consistent sets to make inferences leads to paradoxes such as the contrary inferences first noted by Kent [Physical Review Letters, 78(15):2874, 1997]. Proponents of the consistent histories formulation argue that one should not mix propositions coming from different consistent sets in making logical arguments, and that paradoxes such as the aforementioned contrary inferences are nothing else than the usual microscopic paradoxes of quantum contextuality as first demonstrated by Kochen and Specker theorem. In this contribution we use the consistent histories to describe a macroscopic (semi-classical) system to show that paradoxes involving contextuality (mixing different consistent sets) persist even in the semi-classical limit. This is distinctively different from the contextuality of standard quantum theory, where the contextuality paradoxes do not persist in the semi-classical limit. Specifically, we consider different consistent sets for the arrival time of a semi-classical wave packet in an infinite square well. Surprisingly, we get consistent sets that disagree on whether the motion of the semi-classical system, that started within a subregion, ever left that subregion or not. Our results point to the need for constraints, additional to the consistency condition, to recover the correct semi-classical limit in this formalism and lead to the motto `all consistent sets are equal', but `some consistent sets are more equal than others'.

Branch dependence in the "consistent histories" approach to quantum mechanics

Continuous Time and Consistent Histories

Consistent-Histories Description of A World of Increasing Entropy

Quantum Histories and Their Implications

A Bayesian Account of Quantum Histories

Branch-counting in the Everett Interpretation of quantum mechanics

Wavefunction branching: when you can't tell pure states from mixed states

On the Consistency of the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics

On the Consistent Effect Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics

Incompatible Multiple Consistent Sets of Histories and Measures of Quantumness

Remarks on Consistent Histories and Bohmian Mechanics

Continuous Time in Consistent Histories

A Brief Historical Perspective on the Consistent Histories Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

What Connects Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics?

Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory

Consistent Histories may be strange, but so is standard Quantum Theory

The consistent histories approach to loop quantum cosmology

Histories without collapse

Bohmian histories and decoherent histories

Comment on ``Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory''

Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics with One 'Real' Fine-Grained History