Consistent Histories may be strange, but so is standard Quantum Theory

J. Finkelstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9608007

1996-08-07

Quantum Physics

Abstract:Interpretational questions that arise in the Consistent Histories formulation of quantum mechanics are illustrated by the familiar example of a beam passing through multiple slits.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

On the Consistency of the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics

Elias Okon,Daniel Sudarsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-013-9760-2

2013-09-04

Abstract:The Consistent Histories (CH) formalism aims at a quantum mechanical framework which could be applied even to the universe as a whole. CH stresses the importance of histories for quantum mechanics, as opposed to measurements, and maintains that a satisfactory formulation of quantum mechanics allows one to assign probabilities to alternative histories of a quantum system. It further proposes that each realm, that is, each set of histories to which probabilities can be assigned, provides a valid quantum-mechanical account, but that different realms can be mutually incompatible. Finally, some of its proponents offer an "evolutionary" explanation of our existence in the universe and of our preference for quasiclassical descriptions of nature. The present work questions the validity of claims offered by CH proponents asserting that it solves many interpretational problems in quantum mechanics. In particular, we point out that the interpretation of the framework leaves vague two crucial points, namely, whether realms are fixed or chosen and the link between measurements and histories. Our claim is that by doing so, CH overlooks the main interpretational problems of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, we challenge the evolutionary explanation offered and we critically examine the proposed notion of a realm-dependent reality.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
A Brief Historical Perspective on the Consistent Histories Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Gustavo Rodrigues Rocha,Dean Rickles,Florian J. Boge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.05280

2021-03-09

Abstract:It will be presented in this chapter a historical account of the consistent histories interpretation of quantum mechanics based on primary and secondary literature. Firstly, the formalism of the consistent histories approach will be outlined. Secondly, the works by Robert Griffiths and Roland Omnès will be discussed. Griffiths' seminal 1984 paper, the first physicist to have proposed a consistent-histories interpretation of quantum mechanics, followed by Omnès' 1990 paper, were instrumental to the consistent-histories model based on Boolean logic. Thirdly, Murray Gell-Mann and James Hartle's steps to their own version of consistent-histories approach, motivated by a cosmological perspective, will then be described and evaluated. Gell-Mann and Hartle understood that spontaneous decoherence could path the way to a concrete physical model to Griffiths' consistent histories. Moreover, the collective biography of these figures will be put in the context of the role played by the Santa Fe Institute, co-founded by Gell-Mann in 1984 in Santa Fe, New Mexico, where Hartle is also a member of the external faculty.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
Continuous Time and Consistent Histories

C.J. Isham,N. Linden,K. Savvidou,S. Schreckenberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532265

1997-11-18

Abstract:We discuss the use of histories labelled by a continuous time in the approach to consistent-histories quantum theory in which propositions about the history of the system are represented by projection operators on a Hilbert space. This extends earlier work by two of us \cite{IL95} where we showed how a continuous time parameter leads to a history algebra that is isomorphic to the canonical algebra of a quantum field theory. We describe how the appropriate representation of the history algebra may be chosen by requiring the existence of projection operators that represent propositions about time average of the energy. We also show that the history description of quantum mechanics contains an operator corresponding to velocity that is quite distinct from the momentum operator. Finally, the discussion is extended to give a preliminary account of quantum field theory in this approach to the consistent histories formalism.

Quantum Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory

Adamantia Zampeli,Georgios E. Pavlou,Petros Wallden

2024-09-19

Abstract:In the histories formulation of quantum theory, sets of coarse-grained histories, that are called consistent, obey classical probability rules. It has been argued that these sets can describe the semi-classical behaviour of closed quantum systems. Most physical scenarios admit multiple different consistent sets and one can view each consistent set as a separate context. Using propositions from different consistent sets to make inferences leads to paradoxes such as the contrary inferences first noted by Kent [Physical Review Letters, 78(15):2874, 1997]. Proponents of the consistent histories formulation argue that one should not mix propositions coming from different consistent sets in making logical arguments, and that paradoxes such as the aforementioned contrary inferences are nothing else than the usual microscopic paradoxes of quantum contextuality as first demonstrated by Kochen and Specker theorem. In this contribution we use the consistent histories to describe a macroscopic (semi-classical) system to show that paradoxes involving contextuality (mixing different consistent sets) persist even in the semi-classical limit. This is distinctively different from the contextuality of standard quantum theory, where the contextuality paradoxes do not persist in the semi-classical limit. Specifically, we consider different consistent sets for the arrival time of a semi-classical wave packet in an infinite square well. Surprisingly, we get consistent sets that disagree on whether the motion of the semi-classical system, that started within a subregion, ever left that subregion or not. Our results point to the need for constraints, additional to the consistency condition, to recover the correct semi-classical limit in this formalism and lead to the motto `all consistent sets are equal', but `some consistent sets are more equal than others'.

Quantum Physics
Consistent-Histories Description of A World of Increasing Entropy

C.H.Woo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9901055

1999-09-02

Abstract:A distinction is made between two kinds of consistent histories: (1) robust histories consistent by virtue of decoherence, and (2) verifiable histories consistent through the existence of accessible records. It is events in verifiable histories which describe amplified quantum fluctuations. If the consistent-histories formalism is to improve on the Copenhagen interpretation by providing a self-contained quantum representation of the quasi-classical world, the appropriate quantum state must track closely all macroscopic phenomena, and the von Neumann entropy of that quantum state ought to change in the same direction as the statistical entropy of the macro-world. Since the von Neumann entropy tends to decrease under successive branchings, the evolution of an entropy-increasing quasi-classical world is not described by the process of branchings only: mergings of previously separate histories must also occur. As a consequence, the number of possible quasi-classical worlds does not have to grow indefinitely as in the many-world picture.

Quantum Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory
Comment on ``Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory''

Robert B. Griffiths,James B. Hartle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1981

1997-10-03

Abstract:In a recent paper Kent has pointed out that in consistent histories quantum theory it is possible, given initial and final states, to construct two different consistent families of histories, in each of which there is a proposition that can be inferred with probability one, and such that the projectors representing these two propositions are mutually orthogonal. In this note we stress that, according to the rules of consistent history reasoning two such propositions are not contrary in the usual logical sense namely, that one can infer that if one is true then the other is false, and both could be false. No single consistent family contains both propositions, together with the initial and final states, and hence the propositions cannot be logically compared. Consistent histories quantum theory is logically consistent, consistent with experiment as far as is known, consistent with the usual quantum predictions for measurements, and applicable to the most general physical systems. It may not be the only theory with these properties, but in our opinion, it is the most promising among present possibilities.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory,Quantum Physics
Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics Starting with Records of What Happens

James B. Hartle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1608.04145

2016-08-15

Abstract:We present a formulation of the decoherent (or consistent) histories quantum theory of closed systems starting with records of what histories happen. Alternative routes to a formulation of quantum theory like this one can be useful both for understanding quantum mechanics and for generalizing and extending it to new realms of application and experimental test.

Quantum Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory
Incompatible Multiple Consistent Sets of Histories and Measures of Quantumness

J.J. Halliwell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.012123

2017-06-30

Abstract:In the consistent histories (CH) approach to quantum theory probabilities are assigned to histories subject to a consistency condition of negligible interference. The approach has the feature that a given physical situation admits multiple sets of consistent histories that cannot in general be united into a single consistent set, leading to a number of counter-intuitive or contrary properties if propositions from different consistent sets are combined indiscriminately. An alternative viewpoint is proposed in which multiple consistent sets are classified according to whether or not there exists any unifying probability for combinations of incompatible sets which replicates the consistent histories result when restricted to a single consistent set. A number of examples are exhibited in which this classification can be made, in some cases with the assistance of the Bell, CHSH or Leggett-Garg inequalities together with Fine's theorem. When a unifying probability exists logical deductions in different consistent sets can in fact be combined, an extension of the "single framework rule". It is argued that this classification coincides with intuitive notions of the boundary between classical and quantum regimes and in particular, the absence of a unifying probability for certain combinations of consistent sets is regarded as a measure of the "quantumness" of the system. The proposed approach and results are closely related to recent work on the classification of quasi-probabilities and this connection is discussed.

Quantum Physics
Quantum Histories and Their Implications

Adrian Kent

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/9607073

2000-05-24

Abstract:Classical mechanics and standard Copenhagen quantum mechanics respect subspace implications. For example, if a particle is confined in a particular region $R$ of space, then in these theories we can deduce that it is confined in regions containing $R$. However, subspace implications are generally violated by versions of quantum theory that assign probabilities to histories, such as the consistent histories approach. I define here a new criterion, ordered consistency, which refines the criterion of consistency and has the property that inferences made by ordered consistent sets do not violate subspace relations. This raises the question: do the operators defining our observations form an ordered consistent history? If so, ordered consistency defines a version of quantum theory with greater predictive power than the consistent histories formalism. If not, and our observations are defined by a non-ordered consistent quantum history, then subspace implications are not generally valid.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Quantum Physics
What Connects Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics?

James B. Hartle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0305089

2004-05-29

Abstract:We investigate the idea that different interpretations of quantum mechanics can be seen as restrictions of the consistent (or decoherent) histories quantum mechanics of closed systems to particular classes of histories,together with the approximations and descriptions of these histories that the restrictions permit. (Talk at the the workshop Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics, Center for Frontier Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, September 24--27, 2002.)

Quantum Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Consistent Quantum Causes

Robert B. Griffiths

2024-02-02

Abstract:Developing a quantum analog of the modern classical theory of causation, as formulated by Pearl and others using directed acyclic graphs, requires a theory of random or stochastic time development at the microscopic level, where the noncommutation of Hilbert-space projectors cannot be ignored. The Consistent Histories approach provides such a theory. How it works is shown by applying it to simple examples involving beam splitters and a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. It justifies the usual laboratory intuition that properly tested apparatus can reveal the earlier microscopic cause (e.g., radioactive decay) of a later macroscopic outcome. The general approach is further illustrated by how it resolves the Bell inequalities paradox. The difficulties encountered in an approach known as Quantum Causal Models can be traced to its lack of a satisfactory theory of quantum random processes.

Quantum Physics
Continuous Time in Consistent Histories

Konstantina Savvidou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/9912076

1999-12-17

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract:We discuss the case of histories labelled by a continuous time parameter in the {\em History Projection Operator} consistent-histories quantum theory. We describe how the appropriate representation of the history algebra may be chosen by requiring the existence of projection operators that represent propositions about time averages of the energy. We define the action operator for the consistent histories formalism, as the quantum analogue of the classical action functional, for the simple harmonic oscillator case. We show that the action operator is the generator of two types of time transformations that may be related to the two laws of time-evolution of the standard quantum theory: the `state-vector reduction' and the unitary time-evolution. We construct the corresponding classical histories and demonstrate the relevance with the quantum histories; we demonstrate how the requirement of the temporal logic structure of the theory is sufficient for the definition of classical histories. Furthermore, we show the relation of the action operator to the decoherence functional which describes the dynamics of the system. Finally, the discussion is extended to give a preliminary account of quantum field theory in this approach to the consistent histories formalism.
Remarks on Consistent Histories and Bohmian Mechanics

Adrian Kent

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9511032

1997-03-22

Abstract:Recent work with Dowker on the scientific status of the consistent histories approach to quantum theory is reviewed and summarised. The approach is compared with formulations of quantum theory, such as Bohmian mechanics and the Copenhagen interpretation a la Landau-Lifshitz, in which classical variables are explicitly appended. I try to explain why the consistent histories formulation is scientifically problematic, in that it is a very weak theory, but also scientifically interesting, shedding new light on quantum theory.

Quantum Physics
Consistent Histories as Valuations

Yousef Ghazi-Tabatabai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1306.0127

2013-06-02

Abstract:Sorkin's coevent interpretation shifts the focus of quantum logic from the structure of a propositional lattice to the nature of truth valuations thereon. We apply this shift in emphasis to a simple formulation of the consistent histories approach, expressing it in terms of truth valuations which are brought together in a logical framework. We see that these consistent histories valuations are related to Sorkin's multiplicative coevents, and that they can be naturally described by an adaptation of Isham's early topos-theoretic approach.

Quantum Physics
On the Consistent Effect Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics

Oliver Rudolph

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.531709

1996-06-07

Abstract:A formulation of the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics in terms of generalized observables (POV measures) and effect operators is provided. The usual notion of `history' is generalized to the notion of `effect history'. The space of effect histories carries the structure of a D-poset. Recent results of J.D. Maitland Wright imply that every decoherence functional defined for ordinary histories can be uniquely extended to a bi-additive decoherence functional on the space of effect histories. Omnes' logical interpretation is generalized to the present context. The result of this work considerably generalizes and simplifies the earlier formulation of the consistent effect histories approach to quantum mechanics communicated in a previous work of this author.

Quantum Physics
Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics with One 'Real' Fine-Grained History

Murray Gell-Mann,James B. Hartle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.062120

2011-11-29

Abstract:Decoherent histories quantum theory is reformulated with the assumption that there is one "real" fine-grained history, specified in a preferred complete set of sum-over-histories variables. This real history is described by embedding it in an ensemble of comparable imagined fine-grained histories, not unlike the familiar ensemble of statistical mechanics. These histories are assigned extended probabilities, which can sometimes be negative or greater than one. As we will show, this construction implies that the real history is not completely accessible to experimental or other observational discovery. However, sufficiently and appropriately coarse-grained sets of alternative histories have standard probabilities providing information about the real fine-grained history that can be compared with observation. We recover the probabilities of decoherent histories quantum mechanics for sets of histories that are recorded and therefore decohere. Quantum mechanics can be viewed as a classical stochastic theory of histories with extended probabilities and a well-defined notion of reality common to all decoherent sets of alternative coarse-grained histories.

Quantum Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory
The consistent histories approach to loop quantum cosmology

David A. Craig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271816420098

2016-06-06

Abstract:We review the application of the consistent (or decoherent) histories formulation of quantum theory to canonical loop quantum cosmology. Conventional quantum theory relies crucially on "measurements" to convert unrealized quantum potentialities into physical outcomes that can be assigned probabilities. In the early universe and other physical contexts in which there are no observers or measuring apparatus (or indeed, in any closed quantum system), what criteria determine which alternative outcomes may be realized and what their probabilities are? In the consistent histories formulation it is the vanishing of interference between the branch wave functions describing alternative histories -- as determined by the system's decoherence functional -- that determines which alternatives may be assigned probabilities. We describe the consistent histories formulation and how it may be applied to canonical loop quantum cosmology, describing in detail the application to homogeneous and isotropic cosmological models with scalar matter. We show how the theory may be used to make definite physical predictions in the absence of "observers". As an application, we demonstrate how the theory predicts that loop quantum models "bounce" from large volume to large volume, while conventional "Wheeler-DeWitt"-quantized universes are invariably singular. We also briefly indicate the relation to other work.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Quantum Physics
Bohmian histories and decoherent histories

James B. Hartle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.69.042111

IF: 2.971

2004-04-29

Physical Review A

Abstract:The predictions of the Bohmian and the decoherent (or consistent) histories formulations of the quantum mechanics of a closed system are compared for histories—sequences of alternatives at a series of times. For certain kinds of histories, Bohmian mechanics and decoherent histories may both be formulated in the same mathematical framework within which they can be compared. In that framework, Bohmian mechanics and decoherent histories represent a given history by different operators. Their predictions for the probabilities of histories of a closed system therefore generally differ. However, in an idealized model of measurement, the predictions of Bohmian mechanics and decoherent histories coincide for the probabilities of records of measurement outcomes. The formulations are thus difficult to distinguish experimentally. They may differ in their accounts of the past history of the Universe in quantum cosmology.

optics,physics, atomic, molecular & chemical
The Geometry of Consistency: Decohering Histories in Generalized Quantum Theory

David Craig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9704031

1997-04-17

Abstract:The geometry of decoherence in generalized "consistent histories" quantum theory is explored, revealing properties of the theory that are independent of any particular application of it. It is shown how the decoherence functional of a closed quantum system may be regarded as an Hermitian form on the space of linear operators on the Hilbert space of the system. This identification makes manifest a number of structural properties of decoherence functionals. For example, a bound on the maximum number of histories in a consistent set is determined. When the decoherence functional is positive -- as in conventional quantum mechanics -- it defines a semi-inner product on the space of history operators. This shows that consistent sets of histories are just orthogonal sets in this inner product. It further implies the existence in general of Cauchy-Schwarz and triangle inequalities for positive decoherence functionals. The geometrical significance of the ILS theorem classifying all possible decoherence functionals is illuminated, and a version of the ILS theorem for decoherence functionals on class operators is given. The class of history operators consistent according to a given decoherence functional is found, and, conversely, it is shown how to construct the decoherence functionals according to which a given set of histories is consistent. More generally, the "geometric" point of view here developed supplies a powerful unified language with which to solve problems in generalized quantum theory.

Quantum Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Quantum fields in nonstatic background: A histories perspective

C. Anastopoulos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.533155

IF: 1.469

2000-02-01

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract:For a quantum field living on a nonstatic space–time no instantaneous Hamiltonian is definable, for this generically necessitates a choice of inequivalent representation of the canonical commutation relations at each instant of time. This fact suggests a description in terms of time-dependent Hilbert spaces, a concept that fits naturally in a (consistent) histories framework. Our primary tool for the construction of the quantum theory in a continuous-time histories format is the recently developed formalism based on the notion of the history group. This we employ to study a model system involving a 1+1 scalar field in a cavity with moving boundaries. The instantaneous (smeared) Hamiltonian and a decoherence functional are then rigorously defined so that finite values for the time-averaged particle creation rate are obtainable through the study of energy histories. We also construct the Schwinger–Keldysh closed-time-path generating functional as a “Fourier transform” of the decoherence functional and evaluate the corresponding n-point functions.

physics, mathematical

Consistent Histories may be strange, but so is standard Quantum Theory

On the Consistency of the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics

A Brief Historical Perspective on the Consistent Histories Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Continuous Time and Consistent Histories

Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory

Consistent-Histories Description of A World of Increasing Entropy

Comment on ``Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory''

Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics Starting with Records of What Happens

Incompatible Multiple Consistent Sets of Histories and Measures of Quantumness

Quantum Histories and Their Implications

What Connects Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics?

Consistent Quantum Causes

Continuous Time in Consistent Histories

Remarks on Consistent Histories and Bohmian Mechanics

Consistent Histories as Valuations

On the Consistent Effect Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics

Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics with One 'Real' Fine-Grained History

The consistent histories approach to loop quantum cosmology

Bohmian histories and decoherent histories

The Geometry of Consistency: Decohering Histories in Generalized Quantum Theory

Quantum fields in nonstatic background: A histories perspective