Abstract:In the histories formulation of quantum theory, sets of coarse-grained histories, that are called consistent, obey classical probability rules. It has been argued that these sets can describe the semi-classical behaviour of closed quantum systems. Most physical scenarios admit multiple different consistent sets and one can view each consistent set as a separate context. Using propositions from different consistent sets to make inferences leads to paradoxes such as the contrary inferences first noted by Kent [Physical Review Letters, 78(15):2874, 1997]. Proponents of the consistent histories formulation argue that one should not mix propositions coming from different consistent sets in making logical arguments, and that paradoxes such as the aforementioned contrary inferences are nothing else than the usual microscopic paradoxes of quantum contextuality as first demonstrated by Kochen and Specker theorem. In this contribution we use the consistent histories to describe a macroscopic (semi-classical) system to show that paradoxes involving contextuality (mixing different consistent sets) persist even in the semi-classical limit. This is distinctively different from the contextuality of standard quantum theory, where the contextuality paradoxes do not persist in the semi-classical limit. Specifically, we consider different consistent sets for the arrival time of a semi-classical wave packet in an infinite square well. Surprisingly, we get consistent sets that disagree on whether the motion of the semi-classical system, that started within a subregion, ever left that subregion or not. Our results point to the need for constraints, additional to the consistency condition, to recover the correct semi-classical limit in this formalism and lead to the motto `all consistent sets are equal', but `some consistent sets are more equal than others'.

What Connects Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics?

Quantum Histories and Their Implications

Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics Starting with Records of What Happens

Bohmian histories and decoherent histories

A Brief Historical Perspective on the Consistent Histories Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Incompatible Multiple Consistent Sets of Histories and Measures of Quantumness

Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics with One 'Real' Fine-Grained History

Philosophical foundations of interpretations of quantum mechanics

Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory

On the Consistency of the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics

Decoherence and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Alternative Decohering Histories in Quantum Mechanics

Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics and Copenhagen Quantum Mechanics

Consistent Histories may be strange, but so is standard Quantum Theory

The Geometry of Consistency: Decohering Histories in Generalized Quantum Theory

Epistemic–Pragmatist Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: A Comparative Assessment

Comment on ``Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory''

Consistent-Histories Description of A World of Increasing Entropy

Quantum Mechanics in a New Light

The Problems of Quantum Mechanics and Possible Solutions : Copenhagen Interpretation, Many Worlds Interpretation, Transactional Interpretation, Decoherence and Quantum Logic

Decoherent Histories and Realism