Environmental potential of recycling of plastic wastes in Australia based on life cycle assessment

Can Soenmez,Venkateshwaran Venkatachalam,Sebastian Spierling,Hans-Josef Endres,Leonie Barner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-01901-1
2024-02-17
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Abstract:Plastic consumption in Australia is steadily increasing and is estimated to reach 8.8 million tonnes by 2050. Alongside plastic consumption, plastic waste management (PWM) faces rising environmental challenges in Australia as most of them are currently landfilled. Therefore, the Australian government has published a policy to transition to a circular economy as well as a new strategy for PWM with higher recycling rates. To understand the implications of the policy changes and the environmental impacts of End-of-Life (EoL) options, life cycle thinking is necessary. This study evaluates and compares the environmental impacts of the Australian PWM for 2018–2019 to the policy envisaged for 2030 that includes higher recycling rates and waste export bans from a life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective. From the results, it can be seen that the current PWM is majorly linear (take, make, use and dispose) as most of the wastes gets landfilled and exported to other countries but the future PWM strategy for 2030 results in higher resource recovery and significant reduction in the environmental impacts. There is a reduction in Global Warming Potential (GWP) by a factor of almost 10, if the recycling rates increase from 13 to 70%. The state and the federal governments along with other stakeholders need to implement stringent measures to recover plastic wastes if a transition to a circular economy is to happen by 2030.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the environmental challenges faced in plastic waste management (PWM) in Australia and evaluate the environmental impacts of current and future policy changes. Specifically, the study compares the status of plastic waste management in Australia from 2018 - 2019 with the expected impacts under the 2030 policy goals, especially the environmental impacts of increasing the recycling rate and banning waste exports, through the life - cycle assessment (LCA) method. ### Background of the Paper - **Increasing Plastic Consumption**: Australia's plastic consumption is expected to reach 8.8 million tons by 2050. - **Current Waste Management Problems**: Most plastic waste is landfilled or exported to other countries, resulting in resource waste and environmental pollution. - **Policy Changes**: The Australian government has issued policies for the transition to a circular economy and new strategies to increase the recycling rate. ### Research Objectives - **Quantify Environmental Impacts**: Use the life - cycle assessment (LCA) tool to quantify the environmental impacts of current (2018 - 2019) and future (2030) Australian plastic waste management strategies. - **Compare Different Treatment Methods**: Evaluate the environmental performance of different end - of - life (EoL) options (such as landfilling, mechanical recycling, and energy recovery). ### Main Research Contents 1. **Literature Review**: Reviewed existing LCA studies on plastic waste management in Australia and identified research gaps. 2. **Data Collection**: Based on data from 2018 - 2019, collected relevant data on waste collection, sorting, transportation, and treatment. 3. **LCA Modeling**: Constructed LCA models for the baseline scenario (2018 - 2019) and the future scenario (2030), considering different treatment methods such as landfilling, mechanical recycling, and energy recovery. 4. **Result Analysis**: Analyzed the environmental impacts under different scenarios, especially indicators such as global warming potential (GWP), abiotic depletion potential of fossil resources (ADP - fossil), acidification potential (AP), and eutrophication potential (EP). ### Key Findings - **Linear Characteristics of Current Waste Management**: Current waste management is mainly linear (extraction, manufacturing, use, and disposal), and most waste is landfilled or exported. - **Environmental Benefits of Future Strategies**: If the recycling rate is increased from 13% to 70%, the global warming potential (GWP) can be reduced by nearly 10 times. - **Policy Recommendations**: State and federal governments and other stakeholders need to take strict measures to achieve the transition to a circular economy in 2030. ### Conclusion This study systematically evaluated the environmental impacts of plastic waste management in Australia through the LCA method and proposed the necessity of increasing the recycling rate and reducing landfilling. These findings provide a scientific basis for policymakers and help promote sustainable waste management strategies.