Abstract:Abstract Purpose A circular (bio)economy is sustained through use of secondary raw material and biomass feedstock. In life cycle assessment (LCA), the approach applied to address the impact of these feedstocks is often unclear, in respect to both handling of the recycled content and End-of-Life recyclability and disposal. Further, the modelling approach adopted to account for land use change (LUC) and biogenic C effects is crucial to defining the impact of biobased commodities on global warming. Method We depart from state-of-the-art approaches proposed in literature and apply them to the case of non-biodegradable plastic products manufactured from alternative feedstock, focusing on selected polymers that can be made entirely from secondary raw material or biomass. We focus on global warming and the differences incurred by recycled content, recyclability, LUC, and carbon dynamics (effects of delayed emission of fossil C and temporary storage of biogenic C). To address the recycled content and recyclability, three formulas recently proposed are compared and discussed. Temporary storage of biogenic C is handled applying methods for dynamic accounting. LUC impacts are addressed by applying and comparing a biophysical, global equilibrium and a normative-based approach. These methods are applied to two case studies (rigid plastic for packaging and automotive applications) involving eight polymers. Results and discussion Drawing upon the results, secondary raw material is the feedstock with the lowest global warming impact overall. The results for biobased polymers, while promising in some cases (polybutylene succinate), are significantly affected by the formulas proposed to handle the recycled content and recyclability. We observe that some of the proposed formulas in their current form do not fully capture the effects associated with the biogenic nature of the material when this undergoes recycling and substitutes fossil materials. Furthermore, the way in which the recycled content is modelled is important for wastes already in-use. LUC factors derived with models providing a combined direct and indirect impact contribute with 15–30% of the overall life cycle impact, which in magnitude is comparable to the savings from temporary storage of biogenic C, when included. Conclusion End-of-Life formulas can be improved by addition of corrective terms accounting for the relative difference in disposal impacts between the recycled and market-substituted product. This affects the assessment of biobased materials. Inclusion of LUCs effects using economic/biophysical models in addition to (direct) LUC already embedded in commercial datasets may result in double-counting and should be done carefully. Dynamic assessment allows for detailed modelling of the carbon cycle, providing useful insights into the impact associated with biogenic C storage.

Unveiling the environmental gains of biodegradable plastics in the waste treatment phase: A cradle-to-crave life cycle assessment

Environmental sustainability assessment of biodegradable bio-based poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) from agro-residues: Production and end-of-life scenarios

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bioplastics Production from Lignocellulosic Waste (Study Case: PLA and PHB)

Biodegradable packaging life-cycle assessment

Comparative life cycle assessment of PBAT from fossil-based and second-generation generation bio-based feedstocks

Use phase and end-of-life modeling of biobased biodegradable plastics in life cycle assessment: a review

Bioplastic production in terms of life cycle assessment: A state-of-the-art review

Revitalizing plastic wastes employing bio-circular-green economy principles for carbon neutrality

Lifecycle Management for Sustainable Plastics: Recent Progress from Synthesis, Processing to Upcycling

Life cycle assessment of advanced grade PLA product with novel end-of-life treatment through depolymerization

Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-life Treatments for Plastic Film Waste

Novel Strategy to Interpret the Degradation Behaviors and Mechanisms of Bio- and Non-Degradable Plastics

Biobased Compostable Plastics End-of-Life: Environmental Assessment Including Carbon Footprint and Microplastic Impacts

The greenhouse gas performance of selected biodegradable and recalcitrant plastics in U.S. landfills

New insights into the biodegradation of polylactic acid: from degradation to upcycling

Environmental Impacts of End-of-Life Options of Biobased and Fossil-Based Polyethylene Terephthalate and High-Density Polyethylene Packaging

Depolymerization and Re/Upcycling of Biodegradable PLA Plastics

Challenges and opportunities in managing biodegradable plastic waste: A review

Assessing the environmental footprint of plastic pyrolysis and gasification: A life cycle inventory study

[Synthesis, biodegradation and waste disposal of polylactic acid plastics: a review].

Carbon footprint of plastic from biomass and recycled feedstock: methodological insights