Recycling of Plastics as a Strategy to Reduce Life Cycle GHG Emission, Microplastics and Resource Depletion

Elias W. Gabisa,Chavalit Ratanatamskul,Shabbir H. Gheewala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511529
IF: 3.9
2023-07-26
Sustainability
Abstract:Plastic waste is the most challenging type of waste because its generation rate (consumption rate) is high, and the current recycling rate is low. The increase in the production and disposal of plastics has led to significant environmental problems including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, microplastic pollution, and resource depletion. The study aimed at quantifying the potential environmental effects reduction achieved by recycling the most widely consumed polymers. One approach to establishing a circular economy for plastics is recycling. Plastic recycling as a strategy to reduce life cycle GHG emissions, microplastic emissions, and resource depletion was investigated. Life cycle assessment methodology was employed, considering cradle-to-gate as a system boundary. The results showed that recycling can significantly reduce life cycle GHG emissions and resource depletion. Replacing the virgin material with recycled material reduces the emission to −67 MtCO2e. Recycling could have saved 56.8 million microplastic emissions per year. However, mechanical recycling, which is commercialised nowadays, contributed to an increase in microplastics as much as 2.4 × 109 million particles per year. Recycling will also save about 50 million tonnes of resources from depletion worldwide by recycling around 20 Mt plastics. However, microplastic emissions reduction in the present scenario of mechanical recycling is not possible unless other mechanisms to capture the emitted microplastics are introduced or other recycling methods, such as chemical recycling, are employed.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the significant impact of plastic waste on the environment, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, micro - plastic pollution and resource depletion. Specifically, the authors aim to quantify the potential of reducing these environmental impacts through recycling the most widely - used polymers. The core issues of the paper can be summarized as follows: 1. **Reducing greenhouse gas emissions**: As plastic production and disposal increase, greenhouse gas emissions rise significantly. Can recycling plastic significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions during its life cycle? 2. **Reducing micro - plastic pollution**: Plastic waste decomposes into micro - plastics, which pose a threat to ecosystems and human health. Can recycling effectively reduce micro - plastic emissions? If not, do the existing mechanical recycling methods need to be improved or replaced? 3. **Slowing down resource depletion**: Plastic production depends on limited oil and gas resources. Can recycling plastic reduce the demand for these non - renewable resources, thereby slowing down the rate of resource depletion? ### Specific objectives of the paper To achieve the above - mentioned goals, the authors adopted the life - cycle assessment (LCA) method, considering the entire process from raw material extraction to the final product (i.e., "cradle - to - gate"). The focus of the study was on five of the most common polymers: high - density polyethylene (HDPE), low - density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polystyrene (PS). The main environmental impact categories evaluated included global warming potential, micro - plastic emissions and resource depletion. ### Research findings - **Greenhouse gas emissions**: The research results show that replacing virgin materials with recycled materials can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions during the life cycle. For example, recycling can reduce emissions by 67 MtCO₂e. - **Micro - plastic emissions**: Although recycling helps to reduce micro - plastic emissions, the existing mechanical recycling methods actually increase the emission of 2.4 × 10⁹ million micro - plastic particles per year. Therefore, unless other mechanisms are introduced to capture these micro - plastics or other methods such as chemical recycling are adopted, it is difficult to achieve a reduction in micro - plastic emissions. - **Resource conservation**: By recycling approximately 20 Mt of plastic, about 50 Mt of resources can be saved, thereby slowing down the rate of resource depletion. ### Conclusion This study emphasizes that plastic recycling, as an effective strategy, has great potential in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion. However, for the reduction of micro - plastic emissions, the existing mechanical recycling methods have limitations and require further technological innovation and improvement.