Abstract:Abstract Purpose A circular (bio)economy is sustained through use of secondary raw material and biomass feedstock. In life cycle assessment (LCA), the approach applied to address the impact of these feedstocks is often unclear, in respect to both handling of the recycled content and End-of-Life recyclability and disposal. Further, the modelling approach adopted to account for land use change (LUC) and biogenic C effects is crucial to defining the impact of biobased commodities on global warming. Method We depart from state-of-the-art approaches proposed in literature and apply them to the case of non-biodegradable plastic products manufactured from alternative feedstock, focusing on selected polymers that can be made entirely from secondary raw material or biomass. We focus on global warming and the differences incurred by recycled content, recyclability, LUC, and carbon dynamics (effects of delayed emission of fossil C and temporary storage of biogenic C). To address the recycled content and recyclability, three formulas recently proposed are compared and discussed. Temporary storage of biogenic C is handled applying methods for dynamic accounting. LUC impacts are addressed by applying and comparing a biophysical, global equilibrium and a normative-based approach. These methods are applied to two case studies (rigid plastic for packaging and automotive applications) involving eight polymers. Results and discussion Drawing upon the results, secondary raw material is the feedstock with the lowest global warming impact overall. The results for biobased polymers, while promising in some cases (polybutylene succinate), are significantly affected by the formulas proposed to handle the recycled content and recyclability. We observe that some of the proposed formulas in their current form do not fully capture the effects associated with the biogenic nature of the material when this undergoes recycling and substitutes fossil materials. Furthermore, the way in which the recycled content is modelled is important for wastes already in-use. LUC factors derived with models providing a combined direct and indirect impact contribute with 15–30% of the overall life cycle impact, which in magnitude is comparable to the savings from temporary storage of biogenic C, when included. Conclusion End-of-Life formulas can be improved by addition of corrective terms accounting for the relative difference in disposal impacts between the recycled and market-substituted product. This affects the assessment of biobased materials. Inclusion of LUCs effects using economic/biophysical models in addition to (direct) LUC already embedded in commercial datasets may result in double-counting and should be done carefully. Dynamic assessment allows for detailed modelling of the carbon cycle, providing useful insights into the impact associated with biogenic C storage.

Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emission plastics by a circular carbon economy

Plastic futures and their CO2 emissions

Designing a circular carbon and plastics economy for a sustainable future

Green carbon and the chemical industry of the future

Toward Economically Efficient Carbon Reduction: Contrasting Greening Plastic Supply Chains with Alternative Energy Policy Approaches

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential of European Union’s Circularity Related Targets for Plastics

Recycling of Plastics as a Strategy to Reduce Life Cycle GHG Emission, Microplastics and Resource Depletion

Revitalizing plastic wastes employing bio-circular-green economy principles for carbon neutrality

Carbon Recycling of High Value Bioplastics: A Route to a Zero-Waste Future

Bioplastics for a circular economy

Greenhouse gas benefits from direct chemical recycling of mixed plastic waste

How Does Circular Economy Respond to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction: an Analysis of Chinese Plastic Recycling Industries

Assessing the environmental footprint of plastic pyrolysis and gasification: A life cycle inventory study

Integrated Assessment of the Leading Paths to Mitigate CO2 Emissions from the Organic Chemical and Plastics Industry

Toward carbon neutrality: Selective conversion of waste plastics into value-added chemicals

Chemical recycling of plastic waste for sustainable polymer manufacturing – A critical review

Environmental Benefits of Circular Ethylene Production from Polymer Waste

Carbon footprint of plastic from biomass and recycled feedstock: methodological insights

Plastic recycling stripped naked – from circular product to circular industry with recycling cascade

Perspectives on Sustainable Plastic Treatment: A Shift from Linear to Circular Economy

Zero Plastic Drive: A Comprehensive Review on Unveiling Innovative Sustainable Solutions for a Circular Plastics Economy