Physical and biological removal of Microcystin-LR and other water contaminants in a biofilter using coated sand composites
Pratik Kumar,Hadji Rehab,Krishnamoorthy Hegde,Satinder Kaur Brar,Maximiliano Cledon,Sung Vo Duy,Sébastien Sauvé,Rao Y. Surampalli
2019-01-01
Abstract:Sand as a filter media is often challenged by the presence of organics in the form of natural organic matter, metal ions, and various micropollutants in the source water. It is mainly due to the presence of limited active adsorption sites and low surface area that governs an ineffective adsorption potential of the sand material. Herein, graphitized sand was synthesized to tackle the above limitations using two sugar solution sources: a) brewery effluent (as a low-cost solution) (GS1) and; b) sucrose solution (GS2). GS1 showed 68%, 60%, and 99% higher maximum adsorption constant Pratik Kumar a , Hadji Rehab b , Krishnamoorthy Hegde a , Satinder Kaur Brar a,c,⁎ satinder.brar@ete.inrs.ca, Maximiliano Cledon d , Azadeh Kermanshahi-pour e , Sung Vo Duy f , Sébastien Sauvé f , Rao Y. Surampalli g a INRS-ETE, Université du Québec, 490, Rue de la Couronne, Québec G1K 9A9, Canada b Sorbonne Université, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France c Department of Civil Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, North York, Toronto M3J 1P3, Ontario, Canada d CIMAS (CONICET, UnComa, Rio Negro), Güemes 1030, San Antonio Oeste, Rio Negro, Argentina e Biorefining and Remediation Laboratory, Department of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, 1360 Barrington Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1Z1, Canada f Department of Chemistry, Université de Montréal, Montreal H3C 3J7, Canada g Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, N104 SEC PO Box 886105, Lincoln, NE 685886105, United States ⁎ Corresponding author at: INRS-ETE, Université du Québec, 490, Rue de la Couronne, Québec G1K 9A9, Canada. i The corrections made in this section will be reviewed and approved by journal production editor. (q max ) for divalent metal ions: iron, copper, and manganese, respectively as compared to raw sand (RS). Coating of MnO 2 over the graphitized sand (GSMs: GS1M and GS2M) further helped in Microcystin-LR (MC-LR) removal (3%−9%) when inoculated with MC-LR-degraders, but was not as effective in removing metals, organic carbon and nitrogen when compared to just graphitized sand (GS1 or GS2). Inoculating GS and GSMs (for both sugar sources) not only helped in higher MC-LR removal (10%–15% more) but also enhanced the removal of other water contaminants including metals, organic nitrogen, and carbon. GS1 showed 20% and 50% more MC-LR removal than the sand material when tested at a low and high initial concentration of MC-LR (5 μg/L and 50 μg/L). The highest breakthrough period was obtained for GS1 filter using 1 mg/L Rhodamine-B dye, which was 12 times (48 min) more than the raw sand filter and almost 2.5 times (second best, 21 min) than GS1M. After three cycles of regeneration and reuse of GS1 filter, a decrease of just 14% in saturation adsorption capacity indicated its high reusability aspects.