Abstract:Background: This study aimed to determine the acetabular position to optimize hip biomechanics after transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA), a specific form of periacetabular osteotomy, in patients with hip dysplasia. Methods: We created patient-specific finite-element models of 46 patients with hip dysplasia to simulate 12 virtual TOA scenarios: lateral rotation to achieve a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 30°, 35°, and 40° combined with anterior rotation of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15°. Joint contact pressure (CP) on the acetabular cartilage during a single-leg stance and simulated hip range of motion without osseous impingement were calculated. The optimal acetabular position was defined as satisfying both normal joint CP and the required range of motion for activities of daily living. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify preoperative morphological predictors of osseous impingement after virtual TOA with adequate acetabular correction. Results: The prevalence of hips in the optimal position was highest (65.2%) at an LCEA of 30°, regardless of the amount of anterior rotation. While the acetabular position minimizing peak CP varied among patients, approximately 80% exhibited normalized peak CP at an LCEA of 30° and 35° with 15° of anterior rotation, which were the 2 most favorable configurations among the 12 simulated scenarios. In this context, the preoperative head-neck offset ratio (HNOR) at the 1:30 clock position (p = 0.018) was an independent predictor of postoperative osseous impingement within the required range of motion. Specifically, an HNOR of <0.14 at the 1:30 clock position predicted limitation of required range of motion after virtual TOA (sensitivity, 57%; specificity, 81%; and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70). Conclusions: Acetabular reorientation to an LCEA of between 30° and 35° with an additional 15° of anterior rotation may serve as a biomechanics-based target zone for surgeons performing TOA in most patients with hip dysplasia. However, patients with a reduced HNOR at the 1:30 clock position may experience limited range of motion in activities of daily living postoperatively. Clinical relevance: This study provides a biomechanics-based target for refining acetabular reorientation strategies during TOA while considering morphological factors that may limit the required range of motion.

Morphological features of the acetabulum with coxa profunda in women: a retrospective observational study

Morphological analysis of the acetabular cartilage surface in elderly subjects

Morphology of the dysplastic hip and the relationship with sex and acetabular version

How Does Radiographic Acetabular Morphology Change Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Asymptomatic Volunteers?

Correlation of tilt of the anterior pelvic plane angle with anatomical pelvic tilt and morphological configuration of the acetabulum in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip: a cross-sectional study

The determination of acetabular parameters in a Turkish population sample: CT-based retrospective analysis of side and gender differences

Impact of Patient-Specific Hip Joint Geometry on the Morphology of Acetabular Fractures

Reliability and agreement of manual and automated morphological radiographic hip measurements

Quantifying the characteristics of the acetabulum and proximal femur using a semi-automated hip morphology software programme (SHIPS)

Acetabular morphology variations in a Hispanic population

Prediction of femoral head coverage from articulated statistical shape models of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Reconstruction of acetabular defects greater than Paprosky type 3B: the importance of functional imaging

Influence of acetabular and femoral morphology on pelvic tilt

Association of Idiopathic Cam Morphology With Femoral and Acetabular Version: Analysis of 986 Cadaveric Hips

Bibliometric analysis of the acetabular labrum

What Are the Sex-Based Differences of Acetabular Coverage Features in Hip Dysplasia?

CORR Insights®: Is Quantitative Radiographic Measurement of Acetabular Version Reliable in Anteverted and Retroverted Hips?

Morphometric parameters of the proximal femoral epiphysis and their effect on the hip joint

Acetabular Diameter Assessment and Three-Dimensional Simulation for Acetabular Reconstruction in Dysplastic Hips

Automated Morphometric Analysis of the Hip Joint on MRI from the German National Cohort Study

A Computer Modeling-Based Target Zone for Transposition Osteotomy of the Acetabulum in Patients with Hip Dysplasia