Abstract:Femoral anteversion, acetabular anteversion, and combined anteversion show significant differences among patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) of different Crowe types. Femoral anteversion >32° and combined anteversion >51° demonstrated good predictive value for the use of S‐ROM modular stem in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for DDH. Objectives Due to the technical challenges associated with femoral reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the exact indications for using femoral modular stems, despite their satisfactory clinical outcomes, remain poorly investigated. This study sought to assess the morphology of the femur and acetabulum, and to investigate the discriminative ability of femoral anteversion (FA), acetabular anteversion (AA), and combined anteversion (CA) on the selection of femoral modular stem in dysplastic hips. Methods Retrospective data were collected from multiple centers on a total of 230 cases who underwent THA due to DDH from January 1, 2020, to March 1, 2023. There were 46 males and 184 females, with an average age of 51.57 ± 14.87. Patients were stratified according to Crowe and Eftekhar classifications. FA, AA, and CA were measured using computed tomography (CT). The distribution of these indices in different grades of dysplastic hips was compared, and the correlation between these indices and the selection of femoral modular stem was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and likelihood statistics were performed to investigate the discriminating and predictive value of each index in selecting modular stem. Results Two hundred and thirty hips were included in the study. FA increased as the subluxation percentage increased: type I, 21.5°; type II, 28.6°; type III, 34.9°; and type IV, 39.7°. AA was smaller in type I (16.9°) and higher in types II, III, and IV (18.9–22.6°). The area under the curve for the modular stem was 0.87 for FA, 0.86 for CA, and 0.65 for AA. The optimal cutoff values were FA > 32.6°, CA > 50.7°, and AA > 23.3°. Conclusion Excessive AA and femoral anteversion FA were observed in Crowe types II, III, and IV cases. FA and CA demonstrated strong discriminative ability and predictive value in the selection of a modular stem. The best cutoff values were ≥32.6° for FA and ≥50.7° for CA in discriminating the use of modular stem. Surgeons may contemplate the use of a modular stem when the preoperative evaluation approaches the cutoff value.

The effects of high-dose corticosteroids in patients with septic shock. A prospective, controlled study.

Prediction of 3-Dimensional Coverage Surface Area of the Femoral Head in Hip Dysplasia Through Conventional Computed Tomography

Femurs in patients with hip dysplasia have fundamental shape differences compared with cam femoroacetabular impingement

The Three-Dimensional Morphology of Femoral Medullary Cavity in the Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Acetabular Diameter Assessment and Three-Dimensional Simulation for Acetabular Reconstruction in Dysplastic Hips

A framework for three-dimensional statistical shape modeling of the proximal femur in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

Three‐dimensional assessment of subchondral arc and hip joint coverage angles in the asymptomatic young adult hip

The Effect of the Morphology of the Femur and Acetabulum in Dysplastic Hips on the Selection of Arthroplasty Femoral Implants: A Computer Tomography‐Based Study

The Three-Dimensional Criteria of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Using the Functional Pelvic Plane Is More Useful Than That Using the Anterior Pelvic Plane

Morphology of the dysplastic hip and the relationship with sex and acetabular version

Three-dimensional femoral morphology in Hartofilakidis type C developmental dysplastic hips and the implications for total hip arthroplasty

Using 2D U-Net convolutional neural networks for automatic acetabular and proximal femur segmentation of hip MRI images and morphological quantification: a preliminary study in DDH

Pre-periacetabular Osteotomy Three-dimensional CT Evaluation in Patients with Acetabular Dysplasia

What happens to the gluteus medius in young and middle-aged patients with hip dysplasia?

What Are the Sex-Based Differences of Acetabular Coverage Features in Hip Dysplasia?

Incorporating patient-specific hip orientation from weightbearing computed tomography affects discrete element analysis-computed regional joint contact mechanics in individuals treated with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia

Assessing Femoral Head Medialization in Developmental Hip Dysplasia Type 1 and Type 2 Hip Separation

Radiographic Findings Associated With Mild Hip Dysplasia in 3869 Patients Using a Deep Learning Measurement Tool

Femoral Head Deformity Associated With Hip Displacement in Nonambulatory Cerebral Palsy: Results at Skeletal Maturity

Evaluation of iliac morphology and innominate bone rotation in unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip

A novel classification to guide total hip arthroplasty for adult acetabular dysplasia