The Three-Dimensional Criteria of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Using the Functional Pelvic Plane Is More Useful Than That Using the Anterior Pelvic Plane

Shinya Ibuchi,Norio Imai,Yoji Horigome,Hayato Suzuki,Hiroyuki Kawashima
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092536
IF: 3.9
2024-04-27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: This retrospective cross-sectional study investigated the cutoff values (COVs) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using a three-dimensional (3D) pelvic model reconstructed using computed tomography (CT). We included 107 healthy Japanese participants and 73 patients who had undergone curved periacetabular osteotomy (CPO) for DDH between 2012 and 2017. Methods: The hip CT images were adjusted to the anterior pelvic plane (APP), functional pelvic plane (FPP), sagittal anterior center-edge angle (ACEA), and sagittal posterior center-edge angle (PCEA). The lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular roof obliquity (ARO), anterior acetabular sector angle (AASA), and posterior acetabular sector angle (PASA) were measured. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate the COVs, and the association between the parameters was analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results: The ARO (≥10.2°) and LCEA (≤22.2°) were independent influencing factors for the APP, whereas the AASA (≤53.1°) and LCEA (≤24.5°) were independent influencing factors for the FPP. Conclusions: The 3D criteria for the diagnosis of DDH in Japanese individuals can identify DDH with insufficient anterior coverage, which anteroposterior plain radiographs cannot visualize, and can help determine indications for acetabular osteotomy.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to determine the cut - off values (COVs) of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) by using three - dimensional (3D) pelvic models reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) scans, in order to distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips. In addition, the study also attempts to propose 3D criteria for diagnosing DDH in the Japanese population. ### Background and methods #### Background Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the main causes of hip osteoarthritis (OA), especially in Japan and other Asian countries. Traditional anteroposterior radiographs (APR) have limitations in evaluating DDH because they lack three - dimensional information and it is difficult to accurately quantify the morphological abnormalities of the hip. In recent years, the application of three - dimensional technology in orthopedic surgery has become more and more widespread, which has improved the accuracy and quantification of research. #### Methods - **Participants**: The study included 107 healthy Japanese participants and 73 patients who underwent curved periacetabular osteotomy (CPO) for DDH. - **CT images**: The hip CT images of all patients were obtained in the supine position and reconstructed into 3D models using ZedHip® software. The CT images were adjusted to the anterior pelvic plane (APP) and the functional pelvic plane (FPP), and multiple angular parameters were measured, including the anterior center - edge angle (ACEA), the posterior center - edge angle (PCEA), the lateral center - edge angle (LCEA), the acetabular roof obliquity (ARO), the anterior acetabular sector angle (AASA), and the posterior acetabular sector angle (PASA). - **Statistical analysis**: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. The COVs of each parameter were calculated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the influencing factors of DDH. ### Results - **COVs under APP**: ARO ≥ 10.2° and LCEA ≤ 22.2° are independent influencing factors. - **COVs under FPP**: AASA ≤ 53.1° and LCEA ≤ 24.5° are independent influencing factors. - **AUC under the ROC curve**: The AUC values of ACEA, PCEA, LCEA, and AASA under FPP are larger, indicating that FPP may be more useful in the early diagnosis of symptomatic DDH. ### Conclusions - **3D diagnostic criteria**: The 3D diagnostic criteria for DDH in Japanese patients are ARO ≥ 10.2° or LCEA ≤ 22.2° under APP, and AASA ≤ 53.1° or LCEA ≤ 24.5° under FPP. - **COVs of potential DDH**: ACEA ≤ 49.3° and AASA ≤ 51.4° under APP, and ACEA ≤ 52.4° and ARO ≥ 10.3° under FPP are considered helpful in diagnosing "potential DDH". - **Clinical significance**: These 3D criteria can identify DDH with insufficient anterior coverage that cannot be shown by traditional anteroposterior radiographs, which is helpful in determining the indications for acetabular osteotomy. ### Limitations - The study subjects are limited to Japanese people, which may lead to selection bias. - The study is of a retrospective design, and the symptom changes during the follow - up period may lead to uncertainty in the results. - The three - dimensional CT images are only obtained in the supine position, and the three - dimensional standards in the standing position are still unclear. Through these studies, the authors hope to provide more accurate DDH diagnostic criteria, thereby improving the treatment and prognosis of patients.