Abstract:Introduction: The planning step that precedes a total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedure is crucial. Digital planning software programs are being increasingly used, although few studies have reported on the reliability of such tools. Furthermore, no studies have been conducted on the mediCAD® software, despite it being widely used in France. This led us to conduct a retrospective study to: (1) assess the accuracy of this planning software, (2) determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability, (3) determine how obesity affects the accuracy of planning. Hypothesis: THA planning is accurate and reliable when using the mediCAD® software. Patients and methods: This was a single center, retrospective study. One hundred one consecutive cases performed by a single experienced surgeon were planned retrospectively by two blinded surgeons on two separate occasions. The acetabular cup was cemented in 90 hips (89%), cementless in 11 hips (11%). A dual mobility cup was used in 21 hips (21%). The femoral stem was cemented in 60 hips (59%). The endpoint was the number of exact plans, defined as the same size as the actual implants. An acceptable match was defined as a difference of one size. The match was unacceptable if the planned and implanted size differed by more than 2 for the acetabular cup or by more than 1 size for the femoral stem. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Exact agreement was found by the first rater for 15 planned acetabular cups (15%) and for 45 planned femoral stems (45%) relative to the implants used. The second rater reached exact agreement for 20 planned acetabular cups (20%) and 50 planned femoral stems (50%). The intra-rater reliability for the acetabular cup was average (ICC = 0.57; 95%CI [0.43-0.69]) and poor (ICC = 0.38 95%CI [0.20-054]) for the 1st and 2nd rater, respectively. The intra-rater reliability for the femoral stem was poor for the 1st rater (ICC = 0.47 95%CI [0.30-0.61]) and the 2nd rater (ICC = 0.45 95%CI [0.29-0.60]). The interobserver reliability was low for the planned acetabular cup (ICC = 0.39 95%CI [0.21-0.54]) and the planned femoral stem (ICC = 0.42 95%CI [0.24-0.57]). Overall, when combining the two raters, exact prediction of the acetabular cup was achieved in 31 hips (19%) in non-obese patients and in 7 hips (21%) in obese patients (p = 0.62). Discussion: This study found acceptable reliability of the mediCAD® software. Experience level, radiograph magnification affected the planning outcome in this study, but obesity did not. We currently do not have the ability to incorporate a reliable radiological scale for two-dimensional templating. Some surgeons prefer using a CT scan, but this costs more than conventional radiographs and exposes the patient to more radiation. This study shows that the mediCAD® software can provide satisfactory output for the preoperative planning of THA. Level of evidence: III; retrospective, diagnostic, comparative study.

Quantifying the characteristics of the acetabulum and proximal femur using a semi-automated hip morphology software programme (SHIPS)

Reliability and agreement of manual and automated morphological radiographic hip measurements

Automated radiographic hip morphology measurements: An open-access method

Computer-Aided System Application Value for Assessing Hip Development

Artificial intelligence-generated hip radiological measurements are fast and adequate for reliable assessment of hip dysplasia

A Semi-automatic Diagnosis of Hip Dysplasia on X-Ray Films

Automated Morphometric Analysis of the Hip Joint on MRI from the German National Cohort Study

An automated framework for pediatric hip surveillance and severity assessment using radiographs

Validation of mediCAD® software for fully digital preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

New method for measuring acetabular component positioning with EOS imaging: feasibility study on dry bone

Artificial Intelligence-Based Surgery Support Model Using Intraoperative Radiographs for Assessing the Acetabular Component Angle

Correlation of Acetabular Cup Placement Angles Between an Artificial Intelligence-Powered System Using a Smartphone and Human Measurements

Assessment of Accuracy and Reliability in Acetabular Cup Placement Using an iPhone/iPad System

Monitoring Hip Posture in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Hip Smart Trial System: an in Vitro Validation Experiment Using a Fixed Pelvis Model.

Automating Linear and Angular Measurements for the Hip and Knee After Computed Tomography: Validation of a Three-Stage Deep Learning and Computer Vision-Based Pipeline for Pathoanatomic Assessment

The accuracy and precision of acetabular implant measurements from CT imaging

Repeatability of Inertial Measurement Units for Measuring Pelvic Mobility in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Defining hip osteoarthritis feature prevalence, severity, and change using the Scoring of Hip Osteoarthritis with MRI (SHOMRI)

Developing a Computer Vision Model to Automate Quantitative Measurement of Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients

Radiographic Findings Associated With Mild Hip Dysplasia in 3869 Patients Using a Deep Learning Measurement Tool

CORR Insights®: Is Quantitative Radiographic Measurement of Acetabular Version Reliable in Anteverted and Retroverted Hips?