Intra-patient and inter-observer image quality analysis in liver MRI study with gadoxetic acid using two different multi-arterial phase techniques

Francesca Castagnoli,Riccardo Faletti,Riccardo Inchingolo,Alberta Villanacci,Valeria Ruggeri,Domenico Zacà,Dow-Mu Koh,Luigi Grazioli,F Castagnoli,R Faletti,R Inchingolo,A Villanacci,V Ruggeri,D Zacà,D M Koh,L Grazioli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae045
2024-02-23
British Journal of Radiology
Abstract:Abstract Purpose To evaluate intra-patient and interobserver agreement in patients who underwent liver MRI with gadoxetic acid using two different multi-arterial phase techniques. Methods 154 prospectively enrolled patients underwent clinical gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI twice within 12 months, using two different multi-arterial algorithms: CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and TWIST-VIBE. For every patient, breath-holding time, body mass index, sex, age were recorded. The phase without contrast media and the arterial phases were independently evaluated by two radiologists who quantified Gibbs artefacts, noise, respiratory motion artefacts and general image quality. Presence or absence of Gibbs artefacts and noise was compared by the McNemar’s test. Respiratory motion artefacts and image quality scores were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Interobserver agreement was assessed by Cohen kappa statistics. Results Compared with TWIST-VIBE, CAIPIRINHA-VIBE images had better scores for every parameter except higher noise score. Triple arterial phases were always acquired with TWIST-VIBE but failed in 37% using CAIPIRINHA-VIBE: 11% have only one arterial phase, 26% have two. Breath-holding time was the only parameter that influenced the success of multi-arterial techniques. TWIST-VIBE images had worst score for Gibbs and respiratory motion artefacts but lower noise score. Conclusion CAIPIRINHA-VIBE images were always diagnostic, but with a failure of triple-arterial phase in 37%. TWIST-VIBE was successful in obtaining three arterial phases in all patients. Breath-holding time is the only parameter which can influence the preliminary choice between CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and TWIST-VIBE algorithm. Advances in knowledge If the patient is expected to perform good breath-holds, TWIST-VIBE is preferable; otherwise, CAIPIRINHA-VIBE is more appropriate.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?