In-hospital Outcomes And Trends Of Racial Differences In Utilization Of Mechanical Circulatory Support

akanimo antia,Chinwendu Onuegbu,Kenneth Johan,olanrewaju Adabale,OVIE OKORARE,Favour Markson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.018
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:BACKGROUND The use of Mechanical Circulatory Support (including Left ventricular assist devices) in patients with advanced Heart failure as a bridge-to-transplant or as a destination therapy has been linked to clinically significant 1- and 2- year survival rates. This study examines the trends of racial differences in the use of mechanical circulatory support devices (MCS) as well as some in-hospital outcomes. METHODS We identified all patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (including Left ventricular assist devices) using ICD 10 codes from the national inpatient sample of the Health Care Utilization Project database, years 2016 - 2020. We classified our population into subgroups based on RACE (white, blacks, Hispanics and Asians). Using the chi-square test, we compared the differences in baseline characteristics amongst the racial subgroups and further used multivariate logistic regression to identify outcomes. RESULTS We observed about 95,430 patients with MCS. 73.2% were Whites, 14.3% Blacks, 9.4% Hispanics and 3.1% Asians and of these, Blacks were noted to have a younger mean age of 57 years. The population was composed highly of males than females across all races. AKI (64.1%), anemia (64.9%), obesity (21.33%) and OSA (13.0%), were all reported to be more common in Blacks than in other racial groups. Whites had greater rates of hypertension (14.9%) and nicotine use (25.8%) while Asians had higher rates of dyslipidemia (54.4%). Hispanics had higher rates of Diabetes (14.4%). Our black population had higher rates of cardiogenic shock (aOR: 0.88; 0.78 - 0.99, p=0.033), significantly longer mean length of stay (24.7 days vs 14.5 days, p<0.001) and higher hospital costs incurred ($750,083 vs $517,196, p<0.001) when compared to other racial groups. The most important independent predictor for the utilization of MCS was cardiogenic shock (aOR: 30.67; CI: 28.8 - 32.67, p<0.001); Asians (3.52%), Hispanics (2.58%) and blacks (2.20%) had higher rates than whites (2.13%). Between 2017 and 2020, Whites had the highest rates of Mechanical Circulatory support usage, with 0.78 per 1000 patients in 2020. Asians had the second highest usage rate with 0.69 per 1000 patients in 2020, while Blacks and Hispanics had lower but similar and stable rates during this period. CONCLUSION Despite having higher rates of cardiogenic shock (which is the independent predictor of MCS utilization) Blacks, Hispanics and Asians had lesser rates of MCS utilization. The findings from out study suggests that racial disparities persist in the use and outcomes of MCS, and efforts should be made to address these disparities and improve the care of patients with advanced heart failure across all racial groups.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?