Safety Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Use For Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Among Octogenerians: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis Of United States

Mohammed Faisaluddin,Muhammad Osama,Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay,Samarthkumar Thakkar,Sourbha Dani,Scott Feitell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.183
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Background There is limited data on the safety outcomes of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for Acute Myocardial Infarction related Cardiogenic shock (CS) among elderly patients. Methods This study queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016-2020 to identify AMI-related CS patients aged>80 supported with an Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We analyzed short-term outcomes as well as resource utilization in these hospitalizations. Results A total of 114,265 AMI-CS hospitalizations were identified out of which 16010 were supported with the MCS. IABP was the most frequently used MCS (72.6%), followed by pVAD (25.9%) followed by ECMO (1.47%). The median age of the patients supported with MCS was 84 (82-87) mostly among the whites. ECMO use was associated with higher odds of mortality, and stroke (59.57%, 10.64%) compared to IABP (39.33%,3.14%) and pVAD (51.45%,2.77%) (p <.0001 for all). Moreover, ECMO use was associated with longer hospital stay (median, IQR 9 (3-19) vs IABP: 7 (3-12), pVAD: 6 (2-13)) and mean total hospitalization cost (119204.06$ vs IABP: 52224.85$ vs ECMO: 78288.30$). Conclusions IABP was frequently utilized MCS among the elderly, however, ECMO had the worst outcome in terms of higher odds of in-hospital mortality and stroke rates as expected since these patients are sicker. Prospective and long-term data are needed to evaluate the optimal safety of MCS for elderly AMI-CS patients.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?