Abstract:Research summary: Building on the comparative capitalism’s notion of institutional complementarities, we examine whether firms’ simultaneous adoption of managerial entrenchment provisions (MEPs) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities reinforces or undercuts one another in influencing firm financial performance. We propose that the financial impact of such configurations is contingent on the country’s institutional setting. In Liberal Market Economies (LMEs), where firms face strong pressures to achieve short-term goals, the combination of MEPs and CSR creates shareholder value, particularly when firms engage in internally-oriented CSR projects. Conversely, in Coordinated Market Economies (CMEs), where institutions already curb short-term demands, the combined adoption of MEPs and CSR initiatives destroys shareholder value, particularly when this CSR is external. Overall, our study enhances understanding about the institutional complementarity between corporate governance and CSR.Managerial summary: This study examines how two organizational practices, managerial entrenchment provisions (MEPs) and corporate social responsibility (CSR), combine between them to improve or reduce firms’ financial success. Our analysis demonstrates that institutional framework has a strong influence on their combined effect. When the institutional context supports solutions to coordination problems among economic agents through market-based arrangements, MEPs allow the implementation of strategies directed to promote long-term investments and relationships. In this case, MEPs when paired with CSR allow generating intangibles that contribute to create shareholder value. Contrarily, in frameworks with coordination mechanisms based on non-market arrangements, the joint adoption of MEPs and CSR destroys value by increasing the power of managers and blockholders to extract rents at the expense of firms’ minority shareholders.

Merger incentive and strategic corporate social responsibility by a multiproduct corporation

Corporate Social Responsibility Development: An Analysis Based on Consumer-selection

Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers

Corporate Cultural Spillover and Synergistic Gains: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions

Corporate social responsibility overinvestment in mergers and acquisitions

Corporate social responsibility and the choice of payment method in mergers and acquisitions

Innovate or Merge? The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Relationship Between R&D and Mergers and Acquisitions

Evidence on the trade-off between corporate social responsibility and mergers and acquisitions investment

Corporate social responsibility by joint agreement

To Introduce Competition or Not to Introduce Competition: an Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Investment Collaboration in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain

Impact of target firm's social performance on acquisition premiums

Beyond Linear: the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Market Reactions to Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions

Against Mergers? The Influence of Self-Construal and Self-Activation

Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

Corporate social responsibility and bargaining in unionized markets

Is Corporate Social Responsibility a Catalyst in Distressed Mergers and Acquisitions The Indian Evidence

Is Managerial Entrenchment Always Bad and Corporate Social Responsibility Always Good? A Cross-National Examination of Their Combined Influence on Shareholder Value

Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and CSR Performance: Evidence from China

Effects of Strategic Choices for the Postmerger Manufacturer on Supply Chain Members

Should We Expect Merger Synergies to be Passed Through to Consumers?