Abstract:When investing in corporate social responsibility (CSR), managers may strive for a win-win scenario where all stakeholders end up better off, but they may not always be able to avoid trading off stakeholders' interests. To provide guidance to managers who have to make tradeoffs, this study used a vignette-based experiment to explore stakeholders' intention to associate with a firm (i.e., buy from or become an employee) that trades off CSR directed at the stakeholders' own group (self-directed CSR) and CSR directed at another stakeholder group (other-directed CSR). Results show that stakeholders were not systematically more attracted to a firm that favors their own group over another stakeholder group. Specifically, stakeholders' other-orientation moderated their reaction to tradeoffs: stakeholders higher on other-orientation were willing to forego some material benefits to associate with a firm that treated suppliers in developing countries significantly better than its competitors, whereas stakeholders lower on other-orientation were more attracted to a firm favoring their own stakeholder group. Other-orientation also moderated reactions to tradeoffs involving the environment, although high CSR directed at the environment did not compensate for low self-directed CSR even for stakeholders higher on other-orientation. Second, the vignette study showed that trust mediated the relationship between tradeoffs and stakeholders' reactions. The study contributes first and foremost to the burgeoning literature on CSR tradeoffs and to the multimotive approach to CSR, which claims that other motives can drive stakeholders' reactions to CSR in addition to self-interest. First, it provides further evidence that studying CSR tradeoffs is important to understand both (prospective) employees' and customers' reactions to CSR-related activities. Second, it identifies other-orientation as a motive-related individual difference that explains heterogeneity in stakeholders' reactions to CSR. These findings suggest several avenues for future research for organizational psychologists interested in organizational justice. Third, it investigates trust as a mediating mechanism. Fourth, it reveals differences in stakeholders' reactions depending on which other stakeholder group is involved in the tradeoff. For practice, the findings suggest that tradeoffs are important because they influence which stakeholders are attracted to the firm.

Evidence on the trade-off between corporate social responsibility and mergers and acquisitions investment

Corporate social responsibility overinvestment in mergers and acquisitions

Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers

Corporate Cultural Spillover and Synergistic Gains: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions

Is Corporate Social Responsibility a Catalyst in Distressed Mergers and Acquisitions The Indian Evidence

Corporate social responsibility and the choice of payment method in mergers and acquisitions

Impact of target firm's social performance on acquisition premiums

Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from capital structure and product market interactions

Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency: Does business strategy matter?

Merger incentive and strategic corporate social responsibility by a multiproduct corporation

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Corporate Risk-Taking? Evidence from Emerging Economy

Mandatory CSR expenditure and stock market liquidity

Does CSR Reduce Firm Risk? Evidence from Controversial Industry Sectors

Stakeholders' Responses to CSR Tradeoffs: When Other-Orientation and Trust Trump Material Self-Interest

Innovate or Merge? The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Relationship Between R&D and Mergers and Acquisitions

The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics

Corporate social responsibility dimensions and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the management's self-interest perspective

Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and CSR Performance: Evidence from China

The effect of CSR on acquirer returns of cross-border M&As in an emerging market – a bane or a boom?

Does corporate social responsibility mitigate earnings management?