Reply to the Comment by Sandvik, Sengupta, and Campbell on ``Ground State Phase Diagram of a Half-Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model''

Eric Jeckelmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.089702
2003-08-22
Abstract:In their Comment (see <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0301237" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0301237">cond-mat/0301237</a>), Sandvik, Sengupta, and Campbell present some numerical evidences to support the existence of an extended bond-order-wave (BOW) phase at couplings (U,V) weaker than a tricritical point (U_t,V_t) in the ground state phase diagram of the one-dimensional half-filled U-V Hubbard model. They claim that their results do not agree with the phase diagram proposed in my Letter (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0204244" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0204244">cond-mat/0204244</a>), which shows a BOW phase for couplings stronger than the critical point only. However, I argue here that their results are not conclusive and do not refute the phase diagram described in the Letter.
Strongly Correlated Electrons
What problem does this paper attempt to address?