Sudipto Das,Sahana Das,Sudhansu S. Mandal
Abstract:The proposed $\mathcal{A}$ phase and the corresponding trial wavefunction proposed by Das \emph{et al.} (PRL 131, 056202, 2023) for 5/2 state are argued to describe the fractional quantum Hall liquid state rather than a phase separated or stripe or bubble state.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to respond to Steven H. Simon's doubts about the wave function (WF - I) proposed in previous research. Simon believes that WF - I, obtained by antisymmetrizing the so - called Halperin 113 wave function (WF - II), cannot describe the fractional quantum Hall (FQH) state, and speculates that antisymmetrizing has a relatively small impact on the phase - separated state.
Specifically, this paper aims to prove the following points:
1. **The impact of antisymmetrizing on the characteristics of quantum states**:
- The paper emphasizes that the indistinguishability of particles cannot be simply dealt with by antisymmetrizing, because antisymmetrizing usually causes significant changes to the characteristics of quantum states. For example, the antisymmetrizing of the Abelian Halperin 331 wave function can transform it into a wave function that describes non - Abelian states.
2. **The differences between WF - I and WF - II**:
- In WF - II, different kinds of particles tend to avoid each other due to feeling stronger repulsive forces, forming two physically separated groups. In WF - I, all particles are indistinguishable, so they are more likely to optimize their positions to form a uniform liquid, similar to the known FQH state.
3. **Analysis of pairing correlation functions**:
- The paper shows the pairing correlation functions (\(g_{11}\) and \(g_{12}\)) between the same - kind and different - kind particles, indicating that these functions are close to 1.0 in WF - I, similar to other FQH liquids, rather than showing phase - separation characteristics.
4. **Comparison of entanglement spectra**:
- The paper discusses the results of the entanglement spectrum (ES), pointing out that although the wave function (WF - III) in the toy model is similar to the ES of phase A in some cases, it does not mean that it can fully represent the ground - state wave function of the actual system. In addition, the paper also analyzes the entanglement spectra under different particle numbers and flux conditions, further supporting that WF - I describes the FQH liquid state rather than the phase - separated state.
5. **Summary**:
- Finally, the paper concludes that the proposed wave function (WF - I) and phase A describe the FQH liquid state, rather than the phase - separated, striped, or bubble states.
Through these analyses, the paper effectively responds to Simon's doubts and provides evidence to support the view that WF - I can correctly describe the FQH state.