Osseointegration of Anodized vs. Sandblasted Implant Surfaces in a Guided Bone Regeneration Acute Dehiscence‐Type Defect: An In Vivo Experimental Mandibular Minipig Model
Shakeel Shahdad,Simon Rawlinson,Nahal Razaghi,Anuya Patankar,Mital Patel,Mario Roccuzzo,Thomas Gill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14369
2024-10-11
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Abstract:Objectives This controlled preclinical study analyzed the effect of implant surface characteristics on osseointegration and crestal bone formation in a grafted dehiscence defect minipig model. Material and Methods A standardized 3 mm × 3 mm acute‐type buccal dehiscence minipig model grafted with deproteinized bovine bone mineral and covered with a porcine collagen membrane after 2 and 8 weeks of healing was utilized. Crestal bone formation was analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically to compare three implant groups: (1) a novel, commercially available, gradient anodized (NGA) implant, to two custom‐made geometric replicas of implant "1," (2) a superhydrophilic micro‐rough large‐grit sandblasted and acid‐etched surface, and (3) a relatively hydrophobic micro‐rough large‐grit sandblasted and acid‐etched surface. Results At 2 and 8 weeks, there was no difference between the amount and height of newly formed bone (NBH, new bone height; BATA, bone area to total area) for any of the groups (p > 0.05). First bone‐to‐implant contact (fBIC) and vertical bone creep (VBC) at 2 and 8 weeks were significantly increased for Groups 2 and 3 compared to Group 1 (p
engineering, biomedical,dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?