Abstract:Objective; The present investigation was designed to evaluate the regenerating effects of chip bone grafts harvested from implant drilling and biomaterials with or without combined application of guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the augmentation of peri-implant bone defects. Materials and methods; Four mongrel dogs were used. After the mandibular premolars were extracted for 12 weeks, surgical implantation of 4 titanium implants was performed on each side of the mandible. Chip bone was collected during the drilling procedure. Three-wall bone defects, about 2 mm high, 2 mm wide, and 3 mm long, were created at the buccal side of each implant. The osteotomy sites were separately filled with autogenous chip bone, Bio-oss mineral bone or mixture of both except one defect was left empty. The operation areas of the left mandibula were covered with titanium membranes. The right mandibles without membrane were used as controls. The dogs were sacrificed at either 9 or 16 weeks after the second operation. After the specimens containing experimental implants were resected, the resorption amount of the bone graft was measured. Then the specimens were processed for ground sectioning. The sections were stained with methylene blue and alkalescence fuchsin. Histological examination was performed and photographs were taken under photomicroscope. Results; The mean vertical distances of each bone defects were 2.64±0.17 mm in the D1 (control) group, 1.81± 0.21 mm in D2 (autograft) group, 1.72±0.34 mm in D3 (Bio-oss) group, 1.51±0.22 mm in D4 (mixture) group. Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was significant difference between the results of D1 and the results of other three groups (p<0.01). No statistical differences were revealed between autograft group and Bio-oss group, as well as Bio-oss group and mixture group. It is confirmed there was significant difference between autograft group and mixture group (p<0.05). Histological observations revealed both quantity and quality of regenerated bone in the mixture grafted specimens were superior to that of single Bio-oss grafted or single autologous bone grafted specimens.Whether the membranes were utilized or not, vertical distances of the defects were larger at 16 weeks than those at 9 weeks in all the groups. Bone grafts with titanium membranes were subjected to greater resorption than those without membrane coverings at either 9 weeks or 16 weeks. Statistical analysis indicated there were significant differences in the results between the two groups (p<0.01). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated the utilization of bone chip collected during implant drilling in combination with biomaterial was a feasible methods for repairing the limited bone defect around the implant. Using the mixture of autogenous bone and Bio-oss mineral as grafting material may significantly promote the bone regenerating effects. The functions of titanium membrane need to be further investigated.

Osteogenic efficacy of BMP-2 mixed with hydrogel and bone substitute in peri-implant dehiscence defects in dogs: 16 weeks of healing

The Effect of Rhbmp-2 on Canine Osteoblasts Seeded Onto 3d Bioactive Polycaprolactone Scaffolds

Evaluation of Bone Regeneration by Β Tricalcium Phosphate/Collagen Scaffold Loaded with Bone Morphogenetic Proteins 2 Plasmid in Rat Cranial Defect

Bone Formation at Porous Titanium Implants Coated with Multiple Layers of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Cdna Plasmid in the Posterior Mandible in Dogs.

Immunohistochemical characteristics of lateral bone augmentation using different biomaterials around chronic peri-implant dehiscence defects: An experimental in vivo study

Bone Augmentation of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects Using Multilaminated Small Intestinal Submucosa As a Barrier Membrane: an Experimental Study in Dogs

Periodontal regeneration using bone morphogenetic protein 2 incorporated biomimetic calcium phosphate in conjunction with barrier membrane: A pre‐clinical study in dogs

Effect of Serial Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 and Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 on Periodontal Tissue Regeneration

Bone Regeneration with Bilayer Bone Augmentation Technique for the Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Defects Around Implants: A Preliminary Study in Dogs

Effects of a bone graft substitute consisting of porous gradient HA/ZrO 2 and gelatin/chitosan slow-release hydrogel containing BMP-2 and BMSCs on lumbar vertebral defect repair in rhesus monkey.

Repair of Bone Defects Around Dental Implants with Bone Morphogenetic Protein/fibroblast Growth Factor-Loaded Porous Calcium Phosphate Cement: a Pilot Study in a Canine Model

[Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Gene Therapy on the Bone-Implant Interface: an Experimental Study with Dogs].

Augmentation of Peri-implant Bone Defects with Different Bone Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Pilot Experimental Study in the Dog

Ridge augmentation using recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 techniques: an experimental study in the canine

Implant-guided supracrestal alveolar bone growth using scaffolds, BMP-2, and novel scaffold-retaining device

[Efficacy of Two Barrier Membranes and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral on Bone Regeneration in Extraction Sockets: A Microcomputed Tomographic Study in Dogs].

Development of a porous poly(L-lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffold as a BMP delivery system and its use in healing canine segmental bone defect.

The effects of BMP-2 gene medication on the reconstruction of osteolytic bone defect around implant

Enhanced Osseointegration of Bone-implant Interface by BMP-2 Gene Medication

Hydrogel Delivery of Mesenchymal Stem Cell–Expressing Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Enhances Bone Defect Repair

Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral or Autologous Bone at Dehiscence Type Defects at Implants Installed Immediately into Extraction Sockets: An Experimental Study in Dogs