Pain catastrophizing and trunk co‐contraction during lifting in people with and without chronic low back pain: A cross sectional study

Patrick Ippersiel,Richard Preuss,Byungjin Kim,Cristina Giannini,Shawn M. Robbins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4717
2024-08-27
European Journal of Pain
Abstract:Background Trunk co‐contraction during lifting may reflect a guarded motor response to a threatening task. This work estimated the impact of pain catastrophizing on trunk co‐contraction during lifting, in people with and without low back pain. Methods Adults with high pain catastrophizing (back pain: n = 29, healthy: n = 7) and low pain catastrophizing (back pain: n = 20, healthy: n = 11), performed 10 repetitions of a lifting task. Electromyography data of rectus abdominis, erector spinae and external oblique muscles were collected, bilaterally. Co‐contraction indices were determined for rectus abdominis/erector spinae and external oblique/erector spinae pairings, bilaterally. Pain catastrophizing was measured using the pain catastrophizing scale and task‐specific fear using the Photograph series of daily activities scale. Three‐way mixed ANOVAs tested the effects of group (back pain vs. healthy), pain catastrophizing (high vs. low), lifting phase (lifting vs. replacing) and their interactions. Results There were no main effects of pain catastrophizing, lifting phase, nor any interactions (p > 0.05). Group effects revealed greater co‐contraction for bilateral erector spinae/rectus abdominis pairings (but not erector spinae‐external oblique pairings) in people with back pain, compared to healthy participants, independent of pain catastrophizing and lifting phase (p
neurosciences,clinical neurology,anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?