A Holistic Algorithm for Materials Requirement Planning in Collaborative Networks

B. Andrés,R. P. Escoto,Raquel Sanchis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65151-4_4

2017-09-18

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Pain catastrophizing and trunk co‐contraction during lifting in people with and without chronic low back pain: A cross sectional study

Patrick Ippersiel,Richard Preuss,Byungjin Kim,Cristina Giannini,Shawn M. Robbins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4717

2024-08-27

European Journal of Pain

Abstract:Background Trunk co‐contraction during lifting may reflect a guarded motor response to a threatening task. This work estimated the impact of pain catastrophizing on trunk co‐contraction during lifting, in people with and without low back pain. Methods Adults with high pain catastrophizing (back pain: n = 29, healthy: n = 7) and low pain catastrophizing (back pain: n = 20, healthy: n = 11), performed 10 repetitions of a lifting task. Electromyography data of rectus abdominis, erector spinae and external oblique muscles were collected, bilaterally. Co‐contraction indices were determined for rectus abdominis/erector spinae and external oblique/erector spinae pairings, bilaterally. Pain catastrophizing was measured using the pain catastrophizing scale and task‐specific fear using the Photograph series of daily activities scale. Three‐way mixed ANOVAs tested the effects of group (back pain vs. healthy), pain catastrophizing (high vs. low), lifting phase (lifting vs. replacing) and their interactions. Results There were no main effects of pain catastrophizing, lifting phase, nor any interactions (p > 0.05). Group effects revealed greater co‐contraction for bilateral erector spinae/rectus abdominis pairings (but not erector spinae‐external oblique pairings) in people with back pain, compared to healthy participants, independent of pain catastrophizing and lifting phase (p

neurosciences,clinical neurology,anesthesiology
Altered Movement Coordination during Functional Reach Tasks in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Its Relationship to Numerical Pain Rating Scores

Susanne M van der Veen,Christopher R France,James S Thomas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10090225

2024-09-12

Abstract:Identifying the effects of pain catastrophizing on movement patterns in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) has important clinical implications for treatment approaches. Prior research has shown people with CLBP have decreased lumbar-hip ratios during trunk flexion movements, indicating a decrease in the contribution of lumbar flexion relative to hip flexion during trunk flexion. In this study, we aim to explore the relationship between pain catastrophizing and movement patterns during trunk flexion in a CLBP population. Participants with CLBP (N = 98, male = 59, age = 39.1 ± 13.0) completed a virtual reality standardized reaching task that necessitated a progressively larger amount of trunk flexion. Specifically, participants reached for four virtual targets to elicit 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° trunk flexion in the mid-sagittal plane. Lumbar flexion was derived from the motion data. Self-report measures of numerical pain ratings, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing were obtained. Pain catastrophizing leads to decreased lumbar flexion angles during forward reaching. This effect is greater in females than males.
Associations between pain-related fear and lumbar movement variability during activities of daily living in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls

Corinne Kehl,Magdalena Suter,Embla Johannesdottir,Monika Dörig,Christian Bangerter,Michael L. Meier,Stefan Schmid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73430-8

IF: 4.6

2024-10-04

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Low back pain (LBP) is a global issue involving biological, psychological, and social factors. Pain-related fear has been shown to influence movement behavior, however, its association with some measures of movement behavior, such as spinal movement variability, remains inconclusive. To further investigate this, spinal kinematics during various activities of daily living (i.e., walking, running, lifting, and stair climbing) of 49 patients with chronic LBP and a group of 51 sex-, age-, and BMI-matched healthy controls were used to calculate lumbar spine movement variability which was quantified using different indices (i.e., coefficient of variation, coupling angle variability in vector coding, deviation phase of the continuous relative phase and an angle-angular velocity variability). General and task-specific pain-related fear was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and the Photograph Series of Daily Activities—Short Electronic Version, respectively. Linear regression analyses showed no significant association between movement variability and pain-related fear, however, the sample consisted of younger individuals with moderate disability and with low levels of pain and pain-related fear. In addition, the different variability indices were weakly correlated and varied greatly depending on the method used and the task performed. Therefore, comparisons between studies with different movement variability calculation methods or different activities should be treated with caution.

multidisciplinary sciences
Task-Specific Perceived Harmfulness Predicts Protective Movement Behaviour in Chronic Low Back Pain

Thomas Matheve,Annick Timmermans,Lieven Danneels,Liesbet De Baets

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175025

IF: 3.9

2024-08-27

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background/Objectives: There is emerging evidence that task-specific pain-related psychological measures may better predict movement behaviour in chronic low back pain (CLBP) than general pain-related psychological measures. Currently, little is known regarding the prediction of movement duration and movement velocity. Methods: Baseline data from a previously published randomized controlled trial were used (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02773160). Fifty-five patients with CLBP and 54 pain-free persons performed a lifting task while kinematic measurements were obtained to calculate movement velocity of the L1 vertebra, S1 vertebra, and the lumbar spine, as well as the time to complete the lifting task. Scores on the Photograph Daily Activities Series-Short Electronic Version (PHODA-SeV), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and its Activity Avoidance and Somatic Focus subscales were used as general pain-related psychological measures. The score on a picture of the PHODA-SeV, showing a person lifting an object with a bent back (PHODA-Lift), was used as task-specific measure of perceived harmfulness. Results: The task-specific measure best predicted movement duration and movement velocity of L1 and the lumbar spine, and explained 35%, 19%, and 25% of the respective movement parameters. Although general perceived harmfulness predicted S1 velocity and movement duration, it only explained 6% and 8% of the respective movement parameters. General measures of pain-related fear were not predictive for any of the movement parameters. It took patients with CLBP significantly longer to complete the lifting task when compared to the pain-free participants (ES = 1.01, p < 0.0001), and patients with CLBP also moved significantly slower at L1 (ES = 0.85, p < 0.0001) and the lumbar spine (ES = 1.01, p < 0.0001). These between-groups differences were larger for CLBP subgroups with higher scores on the PHODA-Lift, and to some extent for subgroups with higher total scores on the PHODA-SeV. Conclusions: Task-specific perceived harmfulness best predicts movement velocity. General pain-related fear measures (i.e., TSK and its subscales) do not predict these movement parameters.

medicine, general & internal
Using continuous relative phase and modified vector coding analyses to quantify spinal coordination and coordinative variability for healthy and chronic low back pain patients: An exploratory comparative analysis

Patrick Ippersiel,Dennis J Larson,Shawn M. Robbins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112207

IF: 2.4

2024-06-27

Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract:Differences in coordination and coordinative variability are common in people with low back pain. While differences may relate to the different analyses used to quantify these metrics, the preferred approach remains unclear. We aimed to compare coordination and coordinative variability, in people with and without low back pain performing a lifting/lowering task, using continuous relative phase and vector coding procedures, and to identify which technique better detects group differences. Upper lumbar (T12-L3), lower lumbar (L3-S1), and hip angular kinematics were measured using electromagnetic motion capture during 10 crate lifting/lowering repetitions from adults with (n = 47) and without (n = 17) low back pain. Coordination and coordinative variability for the Hip-Lower Lumbar and Lower Lumbar-Upper Lumbar joint pairs were quantified using mean absolute relative phase and deviation phase (continuous relative phase), and coupling angle and coupling angle variability (vector coding), respectively. T-tests examined group differences in coordination and variability. Cohen's d bootstrapping analyses identified the more sensitive technique for detecting group differences. Less in-phase and more variable behavior was observed in the low back pain group, mostly independent of joint pair and analytical technique (P < 0.05, Cohen's d range = 0.61 to 1.33). Qualitatively, the low back group limited motion at the lower lumbar spine during lifting/lowering. Continuous relative phase was more sensitive in detecting group differences in coordinative variability, while vector coding was more sensitive towards differences in coordination. These procedures convey distinct information and have their respective merits. Researchers should consider the choice of analytical techniques based on their study objectives.

engineering, biomedical,biophysics
Low Back Pains Hidden Partners: Stigma, Anxiety, and Functional Decline in Adults with Cerebral Palsy

JULIE A Stutzbach,Cristina A Sarmiento,Tanya S Kenkre,Joyce L Oleszek,Stephen R Wisniewski,Mary E Gannotti,for the Cerebral Palsy Research Network

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.07.24318657

2024-12-08

Abstract:AIM: Determine biopsychosocial factors associated with pain interference and pain intensity in adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and chronic low back pain (LBP). METHOD: Cross-sectional secondary data analysis of a community survey examining function and chronic pain in adults with CP and LBP. We examined bivariate relationships and built two regression models with pain interference with general activities and pain intensity as dependent variables and biopsychosocial factors as explanatory factors. RESULTS: We included 295 participants with CP and LBP in our analyses. Average age was 43.2 ± 13.9 years, and 81% were ambulatory (GMFCS I-III). Pain was present for 17.9 ± 13.4 years. Ordinary least squares regression models indicated greater pain interference with: change in best motor function since childhood (p=0.002), stigma (p=0.01), and anxiety (p=0.01; N=238; adjusted R2=0.17); and greater pain intensity with: lower income (p=0.01), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (p=0.04), anxiety (p=0.01), and less satisfaction with social roles, (p<0.001; N=290, R2=0.18; Adjusted R2=0.16). INTERPRETATION: These findings emphasize the importance of assessing and interpreting chronic pain in the context of biopsychosocial factors, particularly anxiety, stigma, race, ethnicity, income, satisfaction with social roles, and changes in motor function.
Exploring the Interplay Between Kinesiophobia, Lumbar Joint Position Sense, Postural Stability, and Pain in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Ravi Shankar Reddy,Mastour Saeed Alshahrani,Jaya Shanker Tedla,Snehil Dixit,Kumar Gular,Venkata Nagaraj Kakaraparthi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.004

IF: 1.3

2024-10-19

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Abstract:Objective The objectives of the study were to (1) determine the association between kinesiophobia and lumbar joint position sense (JPS) in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP); (2) examine the relationship between kinesiophobia and postural stability in individuals with CLBP; and (3) investigate whether pain intensity mediates the relationship between kinesiophobia, lumbar JPS, and postural stability in individuals with CLBP. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a total of 83 individuals diagnosed with CLBP were included. The level of fear of movement was assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Lumbar JPS was measured using the active target repositioning technique, which involved evaluating JPS in 3 directions: lumbar flexion, side-bending to the left, and side-bending to the right. The repositioning accuracy of the lumbar joint was quantified in degrees using a dual digital inclinometer. Postural stability was assessed using a stabilometric force platform, which measured anterior to posterior (A-P) sway, medial to lateral (M-L) sway, and the ellipse area in mm2. Results The findings of this study revealed a statistically significant and moderate positive correlation between kinesiophobia and lumbar JPS in various directions, including flexion (r = 0.51, P < .001), side-bending to the left (r = 0.37, P = .001), and side-bending to the right (r = 0.34, P = .002). Similarly, a significant positive association was observed between kinesiophobia and postural stability, as indicated by the correlation coefficients: A-P sway (r = .47, P < .001), M-L sway (r = 0.58, P < .001), and ellipse area (r = 0.51, P < .001). Furthermore, the analysis revealed that pain significantly mediated the relationship between kinesiophobia and both lumbar JPS ( P < .05) and postural stability ( P < .05). These findings were demonstrated through mediation analysis. Conclusions This study identified a significant association between kinesiophobia, lumbar JPS, and postural stability. Additionally, we observed the presence of pain as a potential mediator in this relationship. However, it is important to note that our cross-sectional study design precludes establishing causality or determining the direct mediation effect of pain on adverse outcomes.

health care sciences & services,rehabilitation,integrative & complementary medicine
How Does Self-Efficacy Influence Pain Perception, Postural Stability and Range of Motion in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain?

Roy La Touche

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj/2019.22.e1

IF: 4.396

2019-01-11

Pain Physician

Abstract:Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal problem among adults. Individuals with chronic LBP (CLBP) can present a psychological disorder and a lack of pain self-efficacy. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the process of repetition-induced summation of activity-related pain, the lumbar range of motion, and the postural stability of patients with non-specific LBP (NSLBP) based on their level of self-efficacy. Study Design: This research used a descriptive, cross-sectional study design. Methods: This research included 60 patients with NSCLBP. Patients were classified as having “high” or “low” self-efficacy based on a median split of scores on the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. All patients received a sociodemographic questionnaire, a psychological self-reported measures (Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia; Pain Catastrophizing Scale; Rumination subscale, Magnification subscale; Helplessness subscale; Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; FearAvoidance Belief Questionnaire; Physical Activity subscale; Work subscale); and completed the Temporal Summation Lifting Task, Lumbar Range of Motion, and Multi-Directional Functional Reach Test (MDFRT). Results: The results indicated that the low self-efficacy group had a shorter lumbar range of motion and lower postural stability, in addition to greater pain intensity in the temporal summation lifting task, compared with the high self-efficacy group. The analysis showed that the strongest correlation for the high self-efficacy was between fear of movement and the temporal summation lifting task, and greater scores at the psychological questionnaires, compared with the high selfefficacy group (r = 0.711; P < 0.01). The strongest correlations found for the low self-efficacy group, showed a positive relationship between pain catastrophizing and the temporal summation lifting task (r = 0.765; P < 0.01), and a strong negative association between pain catastrophizing for the magnification subscale and lumbar range of motion (r = -0.759; P < 0.01). Limitations: The results of this study should be interpreted with caution because of its crosssectional design, and therefore causal relationships cannot be established. A significant limitation of the study is that patients’ physical activity levels were not assessed, which could have influenced their ability to perform motor tasks at the perceived difficulty and fear level. Conclusions: The high self-efficacy group had less pain in the temporal summation lifting task, a greater range of motion, and a greater functional range, in addition to a lower influence of psychological factors. Key words: Low back pain, chronic pain, self-efficacy, temporal summation, range of motion, postural stability, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, low back disability

clinical neurology,anesthesiology
Pain-related fear of movement dynamics in individuals with and without low back pain participating in weightlifting and/or powerlifting training

Bernard X W Liew,Josce Syrett,Paul Freeman,David W Evans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276983

IF: 3.7

2022-10-27

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Purpose: Pain-free adults in the general population have been shown to possess unhelpful beliefs that certain movements and postures are harmful to the spine, potentially reinforcing fear-avoidance behaviour. Whether such beliefs occur in individuals undertaking regular powerlifting (PL) and Olympic weightlifting (OWL) training is unclear. Methods: In a cross-sectional study design, 67 individuals who participate in OWL and PL training completed an online survey. Demographic characteristics, training history, and self-reported perceptions of harm, on the 40-item Photograph Series of Daily Activities shortened electronic version (PHODA-SeV), were collected. After removing collinear variables, 13 items were entered into a network analysis, in which the adjusted correlations between items, and the centrality indices of each item (i.e., the degree of connection with other symptoms in the network) were quantified. Results: Twenty-one (31.3%) participants had LBP symptoms. The pairwise correlations with the greatest magnitudes were between images of 'leg stretch' and 'jumping' (0.32 [95%CI 0.08 to 0.45]) and two images depicting ironing (0.32 [95%CI 0.05 to 0.54]) respectively. The three most Central (connected) items were 'stair ascend', 'walking with groceries', and 'mopping with spine flexion'. Conclusions: For individuals training in OWL and PL, images reflecting walking, rather than those depicting high spinal flexion angle, had greater connectivity to other activity items. In addition, the strongest correlations were not between items reflecting high spinal flexion angle. Future studies that investigate the relationship between different intensities of OWL and PL training and the dynamics of pain-related fear are warranted.
The ancient city : new perspectives on urbanism in the old and new world

J. Marcus,J. Sabloff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1548-1433.2009.01161_15.X

2009-12-01

Abstract:Cities are so common today that we cannot imagine a world without them. More than half of the world's population lives in cities, and that proportion is growing. Yet for most of our history, there were no cities. Why, how, and when did urban life begin? Ancient cities have much to tell us about the social, political, religious, and economic conditions of their times--and also about our own. Ongoing excavations all over the world are enabling scholars to document intra-city changes through time, city-to-city interaction, and changing relations between cities and their hinterlands. The essays in this volume--presented at a Sackler colloquium of the National Academy of Sciences--reveal that archaeologists now know much more about the founding and functions of ancient cities, their diverse trade networks, their heterogeneous plans and layouts, and their various lifespans and trajectories.
Task-dependent neuromuscular adaptations in low back pain: a controlled experimental study

Julien Ducas,Emile Marineau,Jacques Abboud

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1459711

IF: 3.473

2024-10-08

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract:Introduction: This study investigated the variability in lumbar neuromuscular adaptations to pain, the task dependency of pain adaptations and the effect of these adaptations on motor performance. Methods: Twenty-four healthy participants performed isometric back extension contractions at 45° and 90° trunk flexion under pain-free and experimental low back pain conditions induced by electrical stimulation. High-density surface electromyography recorded lumbar muscle activation strategies, and force steadiness was measured using a load cell. Results: While considerable variability in neuromuscular adaptations to lumbar pain was observed among participants, consistent patterns were found between tasks. In the 90° trunk flexion position, both sides exhibited greater magnitudes of pain adaptations for muscle activity redistribution in the mediolateral axis ( p < 0.05, 86% increase) and muscle activity amplitude ( p < 0.001, 183% increase) compared to the 45° trunk flexion position. A significant negative correlation was found between the magnitude of the mediolateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity and force steadiness on the left side ( p = 0.045). Discussion: These findings highlight the intricate and task-dependent nature of neuromuscular adaptations to pain within lumbar muscles, and points toward a potential trade-off between pain adaptations and performance.

psychology,neurosciences
Conditioned pain modulation, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing as prognostic factors for chronicity in a population with acute low back pain: An exploratory prospective study

Melody Meilleur-Durand,Marc-Olivier Dubé,Luc J Hébert,Catherine Mercier,Guillaume Léonard,Jean-Sébastien Roy,Luc J. Hébert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102920

IF: 2.658

2024-04-01

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors and alteration of the somatosensory functions have been associated with persistent low back pain (LBP). A decreased capacity of the central nervous system to modulate pain has been suggested as a potential contributor to the persistence of pain.OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether conditioned pain modulation (CPM), initial symptoms/disability, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing is associated with the transition from acute to chronic LBP.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.METHOD: Fifty participants presenting with acute LBP (<6 weeks) took part in three evaluation sessions (baseline, 3 and 6 months). At baseline and 3-month evaluations, all participants completed self-administered questionnaires (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Short Form of Brief Pain Inventory [BPI-SF], Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK] and Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS]) and CPM was assessed. At the 6-month evaluation, questionnaires were readministered, and participants were dichotomized according to their status (Non-chronic LBP [NCLBP] or chronic LBP [CLBP]). Univariate tests were used to compare baseline variables between NCLBP and CLBP.RESULTS: No significant baseline difference was found for TSK (p = 0.48), PCS (p = 0.78), CPM (p = 0.82), ODI (p = 0.78), BPI-SF severity (p = 0.50), and interference subscales (p = 0.54) between those categorized as NCLBP or CLBP at 6 months.CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study failed to support the hypothesis that inefficient CPM mechanisms and the presence of psychological factors could be factors associated with the transition to chronic pain in individuals with acute LBP.

rehabilitation
A Study on the Relationship between Postural Control and Pain-Related Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Qiuhua Yu,Yunxia Huo,Min Chen,Zhou Zhang,Zhicheng Li,Haizhen Luo,Zhenwen Liang,Chuhuai Wang,Wai Leung Ambrose Lo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9054152

2021-11-02

Pain Research and Management

Abstract:Objectives. To explore the relationship between postural control and pain-related clinical outcomes in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (cNLBP). Methods. Participants with cNLBP and healthy individuals were recruited. Muscle activities were recorded during internal and external perturbation tasks. Postural control capacity was assessed by muscle onset time and integrals of electromyography (iEMGs) of postural muscles during the phases of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) and compensatory postural adjustments (CPAs). Correlation analysis was employed to investigate the relationship between postural control capacity, pain, and disability. Results. Twenty-seven patients with cNLBP and 27 healthy participants were recruited. Gastrocnemius (GA) muscle onset time was earlier in the cNLBP group than in the control group in the internal perturbation task. The onset time of GA and erector spinae (ES) of the cNLBP group was later than that of the controls in the external perturbation task. Disability level moderately correlated with the iEMGs of rectus abdominis (RA), GA, and external oblique (EO) during APAs. Pain score moderately correlated with the iEMGs of RA, EO, and ES during CPAs of perturbation tasks. Conclusion. cNLBP participants had altered muscle activation strategy to maintain postural stability in response to perturbation. This study further discovered that pain-related disabilities of cNLBP participants were likely related to the APAs capacity, whereas the pain intensity may relate to the CPAs capacity. Pain and disability may therefore be related to the control process of the posture-related muscles.

clinical neurology
Effect of Cognitive Load on Anticipatory Postural Adjustment Latency and its Relationship with Pain-Related Dysfunction in Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study

Huai-chun Yang,Wen-wu Xiao,Ye-xiao Guan,Hai-an Mao,Zeng-ming Hao,Chu-huai Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00495-0

IF: 3.96

2023-03-17

Pain and Therapy

Abstract:IntroductionThis study aimed to investigate the effect of cognitive load on anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) latency in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP) and its relationship with pain-related functional changes.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from December 15, 2022 to January 25, 2023. Participants were divided into a healthy control group (n = 29) and an NCLBP group (n = 29). Each group was assigned a single task of rapid arm raising and a dual task of rapid arm raising combined with a cognitive load. The cognitive load task was conducted using visual conflict. The APA latency for bilateral trunk muscles was observed using electromyography. The duration of electromyography recording in each task cycle was 28 s. Pain related-functional changes were evaluated using Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) before all tasks.ResultsThe APA latency for the right multifidus was significantly delayed in the NCLBP group [25.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.41–37.35] than in the healthy control group (− 5.80, 95% CI − 19.28 to 7.68) during dual task (p = 0.0416). The APA latency for the right multifidus (25.38, 95% CI 13.41–37.35) and transverse abdominis/internal oblique (29.15, 95% CI 18.81–39.50) were significantly delayed compared with on the left side in the NCLBP group during dual task (− 3.03, 95% CI − 15.18–9.13, p = 0.0220; 3.69, 95% CI − 6.81 to 14.18, p = 0.0363). The latency delay of the right and left multifidus APA in the NCLBP group under the dual-task was positively correlated with RMDQ scores (r = 0.5560, p = 0.0017; r = 0.4010, p = 0.0311).ConclusionsCognitive load could induce APA delay in the right trunk muscles and co-activation pattern changes in bilateral trunk muscle APA in patients with NCLBP. The APA onset delay in multifidus is positively related to pain-related daily dysfunction.Trial RegistrationChiCTR2300068580 (retrospectively registered in February 23, 2023).

clinical neurology
Association of pain-related threat beliefs and disability with postural control and trunk motion in individuals with low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sanaz Shanbehzadeh,Shabnam ShahAli,Isamael Ebrahimi Takamjani,Johan W. S. Vlaeyen,Reza Salehi,Hassan Jafari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07261-4

IF: 2.721

2022-05-18

European Spine Journal

Abstract:Purpose Low back pain (LBP) individuals with high levels of fear of pain might display changes in motor behavior, which leads to disability. This study aimed to systematically review the influence of pain-related threat beliefs or disability on trunk kinematic or postural control in LBP. Method Eight electronic databases were searched from January 1990 to July 1, 2020. Meta-analysis using random-effect model was performed for 18 studies on the association between pain-related threat beliefs or disability and lumbar range of motion. Pearson r correlations were used as the effect size. Result Negative correlations were observed between lumbar range of motion (ROM) and pain-related threat beliefs ( r = − 0.31, p < 0.01, 95% CI: − 0.39, − 0.24) and disability ( r = − 0.24, p < 0.01, 95% CI: − 0.40, − 0.21). Nonsignificant correlations were reported between pain-related threat beliefs and center of pressure parameters during static standing in 75% of the studies. In 33% of the studies, moderate negative correlations between disability and postural control were observed. Conclusion Motor behaviors are influenced by several factors, and therefore, the relatively weak associations observed between reduced lumbar ROM with higher pain-related threat beliefs and perceived disability, and postural control with disability are to be expected. This could aid clinicians in the assessment and planning rehabilitation interventions. Level of Evidence I Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Effect of low back pain on the kinetics and kinematics of the lumbar spine - a combined in vivo and in silico investigation

Ali Firouzabadi,Navid Arjmand,Tianwei Zhang,Matthias Pumberger,Hendrik Schmidt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111954

IF: 2.4

2024-01-27

Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract:Lifting is a significant risk factor for low back pain (LBP). Different biomechanical factors including spinal loads, kinematics, and muscle electromyography (EMG) activities have previously been investigated during lifting activities in LBP patients and asymptomatic individuals to identify their association with LBP. However, the findings were contradictory and inconclusive. Accurate and subject-specific prediction of spinal loads is crucial for understanding, diagnosing, planning tailored treatments, and preventing recurrent pain in LBP patients. Therefore, the present study aimed to estimate the L5-S1 compressive and resultant shear loads in 19 healthy and 17 non-specific chronic LBP individuals during various static load-holding tasks (holding a 10 kg box at hip, chest, and head height) using full-body and personalized musculoskeletal models driven by subject-specific in vivo kinematic/kinetic, EMG, and physiological cross-sectional areas (PCSAs) data. These biomechanical characteristics were concurrently analyzed to identify potential differences between the two groups. Statistical analyses showed that LBP had almost no significant effect on the range of motion (trunk, lumbar, pelvis), PCSA, and EMG. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the predicted L5-S1 loads. However, as the task became more demanding, by elevating the hand-load from hip to head, LBP patients experienced significant increases in both compressive (33 %, p = 0.00) and shear (25 %, p = 0.02) loads, while asymptomatic individuals showed significant increases only in compressive loads (30 %, p = 0.01). This suggests that engaging in more challenging activities could potentially magnify the effect of LBP on the biomechanical factors and increase their discrimination capacity between LBP and asymptomatic individuals.

engineering, biomedical,biophysics
Are Pain Intensity and Pain Related Fear Related to Functional Capacity Evaluation Performances of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain?

Michiel F. Reneman,Henrica R. Schiphorts Preuper,Marco Kleen,Jan H. B. Geertzen,Pieter U. Dijkstra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9078-z

2007-03-13

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract:Introduction: Pain related fear and pain intensity have been identified as factors negatively influencing Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) performances in patients with CLBP. Conflicting results have been reported in the literature. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationships between pain intensity and pain-related fear on the one hand, and performances during an FCE on the other hand in two samples of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods: Two cross sectional observation studies were performed with two samples of patients with CLBP (study 1: n = 79; study 2: n = 58). Pain related fears were operationally defined as the score on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in study 1, and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) in study 2. Pain intensity was measured with a Numeric Rating Scale in both studies. Avoidance behavior observed during FCE was in both studies operationally defined as the unwillingness to engage in high intensity performance levels of three different functional activities: high intensity lifting, prolonged standing in a forward bend position, and fast repetitive bending at the waist. Results: A total of 25 correlations between pain and pain related fear, and performance variables were calculated, out of which 7 were significant (p < 0.05). The strength of these significant correlations ranged from r = −0.23 to r = −0.50. Multivariate linear regression analyses revealed non-significant relationships in most instances. Pain and pain related fear contributed little if any to these models. Conclusions: The relation between pain and pain related fear and FCE performance is weak or non-existent in patients with CLBP.

rehabilitation,social issues
Influence and Relationship of Pain on Lumbar Biomechanics in a Young Adult Population with Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Sagrario Pérez-de la Cruz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12070190

2024-07-11

Sports

Abstract:The therapeutic actions indicated for low back pain, in addition to physiotherapy, include mobilization of the affected segment, as it is assumed that a loss of mobility may contribute to a patient’s pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of back pain on the degrees of spinal mobility in young adults. Eighty-six volunteers participated in the study. Fingertip-to-floor distance, Schöber’s test, the fingertip-to-floor lateral flexion test, GHQ-12, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and the STarT Back Screening Tool were used. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups (pain and no pain) in degrees of spinal flexion (Schöber’s test and side flexion) showing greater mobility in the group with pain. However, the group with low back pain showed less rotational mobility. The presence or absence of back pain had an impact on the individual’s sporting practice and perception of pain, and they were able to carry out their sporting activities normally. Young adults with idiopathic low back pain showed some statistically significant differences in relation to the mobility of the spine in the different planes of movement (flexion and side flexion), conditioning their quality of life and sports practice.
Understanding the impact of lumbar disc degeneration and chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional electromyographic analysis of postural strategy during predicted and unpredicted postural perturbations

Janet A. Deane,Adrian K. P. Lim,Alison H. McGregor,Paul H. Strutton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249308

IF: 3.7

2021-04-01

PLoS ONE

Abstract:People with chronic low back pain (LBP) exhibit changes in postural control. Stereotypical muscle activations resulting from external perturbations include anticipatory (APAs) and compensatory (CPAs) postural adjustments. The aim and objective of this study was to determine differences in postural control strategies (peak amplitude, APAs and CPAs) between symptomatic and asymptomatic adults with and without Lumbar Disc Degeneration (LDD) using surface electromyography during forward postural perturbation. Ninety-seven subjects participated in the study (mean age 50 years (SD 12)). 3T MRI was used to acquire T2 weighted images (L1-S1). LDD was determined using Pfirrmann grading. A bespoke translational platform was designed to deliver horizontal perturbations in sagittal and frontal planes. Electromyographic activity was analysed bilaterally from 8 trunk and lower limb muscles during four established APA and CPA epochs. A Kruskal-Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was conducted. Four groups were identified: no LDD no pain (n = 19), LDD no pain (n = 38), LDD pain (n = 35) and no LDD pain (n = 5). There were no significant differences in age or gender between groups. The most significant difference between groups was observed during forward perturbation. In the APA and CPA phases of predictable forward perturbation there were significant differences ankle strategy between groups (p = 0.007–0.008); lateral gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior activity was higher in the LDD pain than the LDD no pain group. There were no significant differences in the unpredictable condition (p>0.05). These findings were different from the remaining groups, where significant differences in hip strategy were observed during both perturbation conditions (p = 0.004–0.006). Symptomatic LDD patients exhibit different electromyographic strategies to asymptomatic LDD controls. Future LBP electromyographic research should benefit from considering assessment of both lower limbs in addition to the spine. This approach could prevent underestimation of postural control deficits and guide targeted rehabilitation.

multidisciplinary sciences
Kinesiophobia modulates lumbar movements in people with chronic low back pain: a kinematic analysis of lumbar bending and returning movement

Michihiro Osumi,Masahiko Sumitani,Yuko Otake,Tomohiko Nishigami,Akira Mibu,Yuki Nishi,Ryota Imai,Gosuke Sato,Yusuke Nagakura,Shu Morioka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06010-4

IF: 2.721

2019-05-21

European Spine Journal

Abstract:PurposeWe aimed to kinematically analyze lumbar bending and returning movements and clarify the relationship between fear of movement and kinematic output.MethodsWe recruited 45 participants with CLBP (i.e., > 6 months) and 20 healthy control (HC) participants with no history of CLBP. We used the numerical rating pain scale (NRS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2) as qualitative outcome measurements. CLBP participants were divided into two subgroups (high- and low-fear groups) based on the median split of the total TSK-11 score. In the kinematic recording session, a starting-cue beep signaled participants to bend forward using the lumbar region of their spine and then return to an upright posture, and we used a flexible twin-axis electrogoniometer to record the lumbar movements. The time series of lumbar movements was divided into four phases according to lumbar movement velocity, and we calculated the length (sec) of each phase.ResultsPhase 1 (duration prior to cue-induced movement initiation) and phase 3 (switch in the direction of lumbar movement from forward to backward) were significantly longer in the CLBP high-fear group compared with those in the CLBP low-fear group and HC group (p p ConclusionsThese results represent evidence of a particular lumbar movement pattern associated with kinesiophobia. These results might help to identify psychological factors that impact lumbar movement patterns in individuals with CLBP.Graphical abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material. Open image in new window

clinical neurology,orthopedics

A Holistic Algorithm for Materials Requirement Planning in Collaborative Networks

Pain catastrophizing and trunk co‐contraction during lifting in people with and without chronic low back pain: A cross sectional study

Altered Movement Coordination during Functional Reach Tasks in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Its Relationship to Numerical Pain Rating Scores

Associations between pain-related fear and lumbar movement variability during activities of daily living in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls

Task-Specific Perceived Harmfulness Predicts Protective Movement Behaviour in Chronic Low Back Pain

Using continuous relative phase and modified vector coding analyses to quantify spinal coordination and coordinative variability for healthy and chronic low back pain patients: An exploratory comparative analysis

Low Back Pains Hidden Partners: Stigma, Anxiety, and Functional Decline in Adults with Cerebral Palsy

Exploring the Interplay Between Kinesiophobia, Lumbar Joint Position Sense, Postural Stability, and Pain in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

How Does Self-Efficacy Influence Pain Perception, Postural Stability and Range of Motion in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain?

Pain-related fear of movement dynamics in individuals with and without low back pain participating in weightlifting and/or powerlifting training

The ancient city : new perspectives on urbanism in the old and new world

Task-dependent neuromuscular adaptations in low back pain: a controlled experimental study

Conditioned pain modulation, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing as prognostic factors for chronicity in a population with acute low back pain: An exploratory prospective study

A Study on the Relationship between Postural Control and Pain-Related Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Effect of Cognitive Load on Anticipatory Postural Adjustment Latency and its Relationship with Pain-Related Dysfunction in Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study

Association of pain-related threat beliefs and disability with postural control and trunk motion in individuals with low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of low back pain on the kinetics and kinematics of the lumbar spine - a combined in vivo and in silico investigation

Are Pain Intensity and Pain Related Fear Related to Functional Capacity Evaluation Performances of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain?

Influence and Relationship of Pain on Lumbar Biomechanics in a Young Adult Population with Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Understanding the impact of lumbar disc degeneration and chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional electromyographic analysis of postural strategy during predicted and unpredicted postural perturbations

Kinesiophobia modulates lumbar movements in people with chronic low back pain: a kinematic analysis of lumbar bending and returning movement