The Effect of Trunk Position and Pain Location on Lumbar Extensor Muscles Recruitment Strategies

Julien Ducas,Alvaro Pano-Rodriguez,Stephanie Couture,Alessio Gallina,Jacques Abboud
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00086.2024
2024-06-15
Journal of Applied Physiology
Abstract:Purpose: To investigate the effect of trunk positions and experimental lumbar pain location on lumbar extensor muscles recruitment strategies. Methods: 19 healthy participants (10 men: 9 women), aged 25.3 ± 4.7 years, performed isometric back extension contractions in three positions: neutral, 45° and 90° trunk flexion and under three conditions: no pain, caudal pain and cranial pain. Lumbar muscle activation strategies were recorded using high-density surface electromyography. The effect of position and pain conditions on muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistributions was assessed. Results: Muscle activity amplitude was 43% higher in 45° trunk flexion than in neutral position on both sides (p < 0.05). In the 90° trunk flexion, participants showed a more lateral spatial distribution than in the 45° trunk flexion on the left side p < 0.01, 5.4 mm difference) and the neutral position on both sides (p < 0.05, 8.2 mm difference). In the 45° trunk flexion, participants exhibited a more lateral spatial distribution compared with the neutral position on the right side (p < 0.05, 3.7 mm difference). A lateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity was observed in the caudal pain condition compared with no pain on the right side (p < 0.05, 3.0 mm difference). Individual responses to pain varied across all variables. Conclusions: Different trunk positions result in different distributions of activation within the lumbar extensor muscles, possibly based on regional mechanical advantage. No clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation, and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation were found, whereas individual-specific adaptations were observed.
physiology,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?