Dupilumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (LIBERTY-CSU CUPID): two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials

Marcus Maurer,Thomas B Casale,Sarbjit S Saini,Moshe Ben-Shoshan,Ana M Giménez-Arnau,Jonathan A Bernstein,Akiko Yagami,Aleksandra Stjepanovic,Allen Radin,Heribert W Staudinger,Naimish Patel,Nikhil Amin,Bolanle Akinlade,Chunpeng Fan,Deborah Bauer,George D Yancopoulos,Kiran Patel,Leda P Mannent,Elizabeth Laws,Thomas B. Casale,Sarbjit S. Saini,Ana M. Giménez-Arnau,Jonathan A. Bernstein,Heribert W. Staudinger,George D. Yancopoulos,Leda P. Mannent
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2024.01.028
IF: 14.29
2024-03-02
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Abstract:Background Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by recurrent pruritic wheals (hives) and/or angioedema. Patients with CSU could remain symptomatic despite standard-of-care H1-antihistamines (H1-AH) or anti-IgE (omalizumab) treatment. Dupilumab blocks IL-4/IL-13 signaling and is approved for multiple type 2/atopic indications. Objective We conducted two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials comparing dupilumab to placebo in patients with CSU remaining symptomatic despite H1-AH. Methods In LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A, patients were omalizumab-naïve (n=138, age 6+). In Study B, patients were omalizumab-intolerant/incomplete responders (n=108, age 12+). The primary endpoint was either change from baseline over 7 days in the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) or Itch Severity Score (ISS7) at week 24, with the other as a key secondary endpoint, depending on regional regulatory requirements. Studies were pooled for safety assessment. Results In Study A, UAS7 and ISS7 improved with dupilumab versus placebo: difference, –8.5 (95% CI: –13.2, –3.9; P =.0003) and –4.2 (95% CI: –6.6, –1.8; P =.0005). In Study B, tested at alpha 0.043 after interim analysis (IA), UAS7 improved (difference: –5.8 [95% CI: –11.4, –0.3; P =.0390]), with a numerical trend in ISS7 (difference: –2.9 [95% CI: –5.7, –0.07; nominal P =.0449, not significant]). Pooled safety data was consistent between dupilumab and placebo and with the known dupilumab safety profile. Conclusion Dupilumab reduced urticaria activity by reducing itch and hives severity in omalizumab-naïve patients with CSU uncontrolled with H1-AH. Although the primary endpoint for Study B was not met, dupilumab effects were small in patients who were omalizumab-intolerant/incomplete responders.
immunology,allergy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?