Laboratory safety of dupilumab in moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis: results from three phase III trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1, LIBERTY AD SOLO 2, LIBERTY AD CHRONOS)

A. Wollenberg,L.A. Beck,A. Blauvelt,E.L. Simpson,Z. Chen,Q. Chen,B. Shumel,F.A. Khokhar,T. Hultsch,E. Rizova,A.B. Rossi,N.M.H. Graham,G. Pirozzi,Y. Lu,M. Ardeleanu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18434
IF: 11.113
2019-12-01
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:BackgroundDupilumab (monoclonal antibody blocking the shared receptor subunit for IL‐4 and IL‐13) is approved for patients aged ≥12 years with inadequately controlled, moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab trials of up to 52 weeks demonstrated efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD inadequately controlled with topical medications. ObjectiveTo further characterise the safety of dupilumab by evaluating clinical laboratory findings from three randomised, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled phase III trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 & 2 and LIBERTY AD CHRONOS). MethodsPatients were randomised 1:1:1 (SOLO 1 & 2) or 3:1:3 (CHRONOS) for 16 and 52 weeks, respectively, to dupilumab weekly, every 2 weeks or placebo. CHRONOS patients received a standardised concomitant topical corticosteroid regimen. Laboratory outcomes were summarised descriptively in 1376 patients from SOLO 1 & 2 and 740 from CHRONOS. ResultsTreatment groups had similar results in baseline laboratory parameters. Platelets and neutrophils showed mild decreases from baseline in dupilumab vs. placebo groups. Some dupilumab‐treated patients had small transient increases in eosinophils. Grade 3 eosinophilia was reported in < 1% of dupilumab‐treated and placebo‐treated patients; no adverse events were associated with eosinophilia. Lactate dehydrogenase levels decreased from baseline during dupilumab treatment in all trials. No clinically meaningful changes were observed between treatment groups in other haematology, chemistry or urinalysis parameters. ConclusionsThere were no clinically important changes in routine laboratory parameters that could be attributed to dupilumab. This study supports use of dupilumab as a systemic treatment for moderate‐to‐severe AD that does not require laboratory monitoring.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?