566 - Efficacy of dupilumab treatment in atopic hand and foot dermatitis across morphological subtypes: results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Margitta Worm,Eric L Simpson,Golara Honari,Weily Soong,Andreas Pinter,Koji Masuda,Liyang Shao,Ariane Dubost-Brama,Ashish Bansal,Andrew Korotzer,Ana B Rossi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad498.062
IF: 11.113
2024-02-01
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Introduction/Background Dupilumab has previously shown to significantly improve signs, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic hand and foot dermatitis. Objective To investigate the efficacy of dupilumab across morphological subtypes in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic hand and foot dermatitis. Methods The phase 3, randomized, double-blind LIBERTY-AD-HAFT (NCT04417894) trial enrolled patients aged ≥12 years with moderate-to-severe (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] score of 3/4) atopic hand and foot dermatitis. Patients were randomized to dupilumab monotherapy 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) in adults; 200/300 mg q2w in adolescents, or placebo for 16 weeks. This analysis reports the percent change from baseline in modified total lesion sign score (mTLSS) by hand and foot morphological subtypes: chronic dry fissured, hyperkeratotic (palmar/plantar), and other. Results 133 patients enrolled into this study and were randomized to dupilumab (n = 67) or placebo (n = 66). Atopic hand and foot morphologies were reported in 3 categories: chronic dry fissured (n = 63), hyperkeratotic (palmar/plantar; n = 37), and other (n = 33) In the “other” category, dyshidrotic was the most frequent morphology (n = 13). mTLSS values were similar at baseline for all morphological subtypes. At Week 16, greater improvements were seen in the percent change from baseline (SE) in mTLSS for patients receiving dupilumab vs placebo in all categories: chronic dry fissured (−65.6% [5.1] vs −31.5% [6.2]), hyperkeratotic (palmar/plantar; −58.2% [7.6] vs −11.8% [7.7]), and other (−64.5% [11.6] vs −29.9% [9.0]). Safety was consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile in patients with atopic dermatitis. Conclusions The efficacy of dupilumab remains consistent across different hand and foot dermatitis morphologies and shows higher treatment benefit across subtypes compared with placebo.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?