Lorentz and CPT Tests in QED

Robert Bluhm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1374973
2000-11-22
Abstract:A theoretical framework extending QED in the context of the standard model is used to analyze a variety of Lorentz and CPT tests in atomic systems. Experimental signatures of possible Lorentz and CPT violation in these systems are investigated, and bounds are discussed.
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Testing possible violations of Lorentz symmetry and CPT symmetry in the quantum electrodynamics (QED) system**. Specifically, the author uses the Standard Model Extension framework to analyze Lorentz and CPT symmetry tests in various atomic systems and explore the experimental signals that may emerge in these systems, in the hope of discovering potential symmetry - breaking phenomena and estimating the precision that experiments can achieve. ### Main problems and research objectives 1. **Analyze the sensitivity of the QED system to Lorentz and CPT symmetry violations**: - By introducing Lorentz and CPT symmetry - breaking terms, the author analyzes the influence of these breaking terms on the QED system. - Studies new signals that may be observed in different experimental systems (such as Penning traps, clock comparison experiments, hydrogen and anti - hydrogen experiments, etc.). 2. **Search for new experimental signals**: - Explores the possibility of re - analyzing existing experimental data or conducting new experiments to obtain more stringent symmetry - breaking bounds. - Proposes several possible experimental schemes to improve the detection sensitivity to Lorentz and CPT symmetry violations. 3. **Estimate experimental bounds**: - Using the Standard Model Extension framework, the author evaluates the experimental precision that different experimental systems can achieve. - For example, for the \(g\)-factor difference between electrons and positrons, the bound \(r_e=\frac{|g_e^--g_e^+|}{g_{avg}}\sim < 2\times 10^{-12}\) is given. ### Experimental systems and results - **Penning trap experiments**: - Compares the \(g\)-factors and charge - to - mass ratios of particles and antiparticles and obtains very precise CPT symmetry bounds. - Finds that the immediate differences in abnormal frequencies and sidereal time variations can be used as signals of Lorentz and CPT symmetry violations. - **Clock comparison experiments**: - Analyzes Hughes - Drever - type experiments, which test Lorentz invariance by comparing the frequency changes of two "clocks". - Extracts approximate bounds of various Lorentz - breaking parameters from the published results. - **Hydrogen and anti - hydrogen experiments**: - Studies the high - precision spectroscopic measurement experiments proposed by CERN, especially the 1S - 2S transition. - Finds that the magnetic field plays a crucial role in these experiments and that certain transitions are highly sensitive to Lorentz and CPT violations. - **Spin - polarized matter experiments**: - Using spin - polarized torsion pendulum experiments, it is possible to achieve high sensitivity to Lorentz violations. - For example, the experiment at the University of Washington obtained the best bound for the electron parameter \(|\tilde{b}_e^J|\sim < 1.4\times 10^{-28}\text{GeV}\). - **Muon experiments**: - Analyzes experiments involving second - generation leptons, including the muon \(g - 2\) experiment. - Finds that the muon hyperfine transition in a strong magnetic field is very sensitive to Lorentz and CPT violations. ### Summary By extending the QED theoretical framework, the author shows the sensitivity of low - energy experiments to Planck - scale suppression factors and points out that experiments traditionally considered as Lorentz tests are actually also sensitive to CPT symmetry, and vice versa. These atomic experiments and particle physics experiments complement each other and jointly test the robustness of the Standard Model at a higher precision. ### Formula summary - \(r_e = \frac{|g_e^- - g_e^+|}{g_{avg}}\sim < 2\times 10^{-12}\) - \(r_p=\frac{|(q_p/m_p)-(q_{\bar{p}}/m_{\bar{p}})|}{(q/m)_{avg}}\sim < 9\times 10^{-11}\) - \(r_H=\frac{|\Delta\nu_{1S - 2S}|}{\nu_{1S - 2S}}\sim < 10^{-15}-10^{-18}\) These formulas show the sensitivities of different experimental systems to Lorentz and CPT symmetry violations.