Abstract:One may argue that the simplest type of neural networks beyond a single perceptron is an array of several perceptrons in parallel. In spite of their simplicity, such circuits can compute any Boolean function if one views the majority of the binary perceptron outputs as the binary output of the parallel perceptron, and they are universal approximators for arbitrary continuous functions with values in [0,1] if one views the fraction of perceptrons that output 1 as the analog output of the parallel perceptron. Note that in contrast to the familiar model of a "multi-layer perceptron" the parallel perceptron that we consider here has just binary values as outputs of gates on the hidden layer. For a long time one has thought that there exists no competitive learning algorithm for these extremely simple neural networks, which also came to be known as committee machines. It is commonly assumed that one has to replace the hard threshold gates on the hidden layer by sigmoidal gates (or RBF-gates) and that one has to tune the weights on at least two successive layers in order to achieve satisfactory learning results for any class of neural networks that yield universal approximators. We show that this assumption is not true, by exhibiting a simple learning algorithm for parallel perceptrons - the parallel delta rule (p-delta rule). In contrast to backprop for multi-layer perceptrons, the p-delta rule only has to tune a single layer of weights, and it does not require the computation and communication of analog values with high precision. Reduced communication also distinguishes our new learning rule from other learning rules for parallel perceptrons such as MADALINE. Obviously these features make the p-delta rule attractive as a biologically more realistic alternative to backprop in biological neural circuits, but also for implementations in special purpose hardware. We show that the p-delta rule also implements gradient descent-with regard to a suitable error measure-although it does not require to compute derivatives. Furthermore it is shown through experiments on common real-world benchmark datasets that its performance is competitive with that of other learning approaches from neural networks and machine learning. It has recently been shown [Anthony, M. (2007). On the generalization error of fixed combinations of classifiers. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 73(5), 725-734; Anthony, M. (2004). On learning a function of perceptrons. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks (pp. 967-972): Vol. 2] that one can also prove quite satisfactory bounds for the generalization error of this new learning rule.

Storage Capacity of the Tilinglike Learning Algorithm

Capacity of the Hebbian-Hopfield network associative memory

Storage properties of a quantum perceptron

Capacity of the covariance perceptron

Learning and generalization theories of large committee--machines

Exponential Capacity of Dense Associative Memories

Capacity Lower Bound for the Ising Perceptron.

Storage capacity in symmetric binary perceptrons

What Determines the Capacity of Autoassociative Memories in the Brain

On a model of associative memory with huge storage capacity

The Exponential Capacity of Dense Associative Memories

A Post-Quantum Associative Memory

Limits to Reservoir Learning

On the capacity of a quantum perceptron for storing biased patterns

The capacity of the Hopfield associative memory

Optimal capacity of the Blume-Emery-Griffiths perceptron

Approximating the Number of Relevant Variables in a Parity Implies Proper Learning

A learning rule for very simple universal approximators consisting of a single layer of perceptrons

A note on the capacity of the binary perceptron

Infinite dSprites for Disentangled Continual Learning: Separating Memory Edits from Generalization

Scaling Laws for Associative Memories