Abstract:It is not generally known, that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of plus and minus 1s that are writable on <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://paper.This" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell's inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://sets.For" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, nonlocal, deterministic, random, or <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://nonsensical.It" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross correlated data sets that experimentally exist or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://derivation.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them.A new inequality results, the Wigner inequality that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://experiments.If" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.

Non-Kolmogorov probability models and modified Bell's inequality

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Loophole-free Bell inequality violations cannot disprove local realism

On the applicability of Kolmogorov's theory of probability to the description of quantum phenomena. Part I: Foundations

Unseen facts due to the statistical derivation of the Bell inequality and their logical consequences

A possible statistics loophole in Bell's theorem

After Bell

Kolmogorovian Censorship, Predictive Incompleteness, and the locality loophole in Bell experiments

Bell's nonlocality in a general nonsignaling case: quantitatively and conceptually

Against Bell's Theorem

Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality

Maximal violation of Bell's inequality and atomic cascade photons

Bell's Inequality and Heisenberg Measurements on Relativistic Quantum Systems

Kupczynski's Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are constrained by Bell's theorem

Counterfactual restrictions and Bell's theorem

A Markovian Model for Joint Observations, Bell's Inequality and Hidden States

Bell's theorem in time without inequalities

Test of the physical significance of Bell nonlocality

What in fact proves the violation of the Bell-type inequalities?

The Bell inequality, inviolable by data used consistently with its derivation, leads to quantum correlations that satisfy it, and probabilities that satisfy the Wigner inequality

Quantum Collapse Bell Inequalities