Analysis on the factors affecting the efficacy of 131Ⅰ remnant ablation in patients after thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma
傅宏亮,王辉,吴靖川,李佳宁,邹仁健,杜学亮
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9780.2009.03.003
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective 131Ⅰ is the most effective treatment for thyroidal remnant ablation after thy-roidectomy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Ways to improve its therapeutic efficacy have been a major clinical concern. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of thyroid ablation by finding out its leading factors. Methods Eighty cases of post-operative DTC patients who had undergone first 131Ⅰ remnant ablation therapy were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of the therapy was assessed by a diagnostic 131Ⅰ whole body follow-up scan 3- 6 months later. The ablation therapy was considered to be suc-cessful only if no conceivable radioactivity was detected in the thyroidectomy bed. The χ2 test and multi-vari-ance Binary Logistic regression were used to analyze 9 variances which might affect the therapeutic efficacy, including gender, age (<45 years and ≥45 years), type of pathology (papillary or follicular carcinoma), metastasis, residual thyroid weight (low, median, high), 24 h radioiodine uptake ratio (< 10%, 10%-20%, >20%), thyroglobulin (Tg, negative or positive), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH, <30 mU/L, 30-60 mU/L, >60 mU/L), and radioiodine dose (<1850 MBq,1850-3700 MBq, >3700 MBq). Results 131Ⅰ remnant ablation therapy was successful in 58 of 80 DTC patients (72.5%). Three variances were found to have affected the therapeutic efficacy: residual thyroid weight, 24 h radioiodine uptake ratio and 131Ⅰ dose. The corresponding intra-groups statistical difference of those 3 variances was significant by χ2 test (χ2 = 8.892, 9.528, 15.085, P = 0.012, 0.009, 0. 001), while the intra-group statistical differences of the remaining variances were insignificant (χ2 =0.486, 0. 051, 0. 322, 0. 010, 0. 006, 2. 575, all P > 0. 05). All 9 variances were analyzed by the multi-variance Binary Logistic regression model through for-ward stepwise. The variance of residual thyroid weight (X1) and 131Ⅰ dose (X2) were finally selected as the 2 key parameters in the formula, P=e(-0.865-0.868X1+1.677X2)/[1-e(-0.865-0.868X1+1.677X2)] , by the Binary Logistic regression analysis (Wald values were 3.752 and9. 130, P=0.049, 0.003). Conclusions The efficacy of 131Ⅰ ablation of thyroidal remnant in post-operative DTC patients was mainly determined by the re-sidual thyroid weight and the therapeutic 131Ⅰ dose. The other 7 factors included in this study were not found to be statistically significant.