LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Middle cerebral artery tortuosity associated with aneurysm development

Zhiyuan Yu,Jun Zheng,Hao Li,C. You

2019-01-01

Abstract:TO THE EDITOR: We read with great interest the article by Kliś et al.2 (Kliś KM, Krzyżewski RM, Kwinta BM, et al: Computer-aided analysis of middle cerebral artery tortuosity: association with aneurysm development. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print May 18, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172114]). The authors conclude that “an increased deviation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) from a straight axis (described by relative length [RL]), a decreased sum of all MCA angles (described by sum of angle metrics [SOAM]), a local increase of the MCA angle heterogeneity, and an increase in changes in an artery’s course (described by inflection count metric [ICM]) are associated with MCA aneurysm formation.” They revealed that MCA tortuosity may play an important role in aneurysm formation and provided important clues for exploring the pathological causes of aneurysm formation. However, we still have some confusion about the article. First, according to the calculation method for the tortuosity descriptors proposed by the authors, the size of the SOAM, ICM, and triangular index (TI) is positively related to tortuosity; that is, the larger the value, the greater the degree of tortuosity. The RL is negatively associated to the degree of tortuosity; that is, the smaller the value, the greater the degree of tortuosity. The product of the angle distance (PAD) may have a positive or a negative correlation with tortuosity since that descriptor is calculated as the product of the SOAM and the RL.4 The results of their study showed that patients with aneurysms had higher TI and ICM values but lower RL and PAD values.1 The above results clearly show that the degree of tortuosity is greater in the aneurysm group. However, in contradiction with this, the SOAM values are lower in the aneurysm group. Moreover, the authors mention in the Discussion, “In terms of a lower SOAM in arteries with an MCA aneurysm, the explanation is most probably connected with fluid dynamics. Artery tortuosity increases the resistance to blood flow. . . . Therefore, blood flow through an artery with larger local angles may cause a local decrease in blood pressure. This also leads to a decrease in local blood flow. Lower blood flow and blood pressure are protective factors against aneurysm formation.” Nevertheless, according to that explanation, it can be inferred that the incidence of aneurysms in patients with local tortuosity should be decreased rather than increased. Therefore, it would be better for the authors to provide an in-depth explanation about the above results and arguments. Second, the authors stated, “There are a few rare genetic syndromes that are linked to the presence of vessel tortuosity, such as artery tortuosity syndrome or LoeysDietz syndrome.” The genetic syndromes they mention are systemic lesions involving multiple parts of vessels of the body and therefore often involve multiple intracranial aneurysms.1,3,5 However, this article did not provide detailed information on the characteristics of intracranial aneurysms, for example, the incidence of multiple aneurysms, the specific sites of the MCA aneurysms (M1, M2, M3, M4), and the size of the aneurysms, etc. We believe this information has important implications for further exploration of the factors related to the formation of an aneurysm and its relationship with arterial tortuosity.