Morphological and Hemodynamic Differences Between Aneurysmal Middle Cerebral Artery Bifurcation and Contralateral Nonaneurysmal Anatomy.

Jianping Song,Fengping Zhu,Yi Qian,Chubin Ou,Jiajun Cai,Xiang Zou,Zehan Wu,Wei Zhu,Liang Chen,Ying Mao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx093
2017-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The morphological and hemodynamic features differ between middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcations with and without aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the morphological and hemodynamic differences between aneurysmal MCA bifurcation and contralateral nonaneurysmal anatomy. METHODS: Computed tomography angiography of 36 patients with unilateral small saccular MCA bifurcation aneurysms was evaluated. The parent-daughter angles (phi 1 for larger branch and phi 2 for smaller branch), bifurcation angle (phi = phi 1 + phi 2), inclination angle (gamma angle), and their relationships with the MCA bifurcation locations were analyzed. Computational fluid dynamics simulation was performed in 6 cases to explore the hemodynamics influenced by the bifurcation morphology. RESULTS: The phi angle was significantly higher in aneurysmal than contralateral nonaneurysmal bifurcations (160.8 degrees +/- 31.0 degrees vs 99.0 degrees +/- 19.2 degrees, respectively; P = .000); the phi 1, phi 2, and gamma angles were also higher. However, by regression analysis combined with MCA bifurcation locations, only the phi angle might be associated with the aneurysm presence (odds ratio = 1.120, 95% confidence interval = 1.059-1.185) and a phi angle cut-off of 124.8 degrees was established. Computational fluid dynamics simulation demonstrated that flow resistance of the wider aneurysmal MCA bifurcation was significantly higher than that on the contralateral side. CONCLUSION: A larger phi angle was more prevalent in aneurysmal than nonaneurysmal MCA bifurcations, and the higher flow resistance caused by the larger phi angle might be a potential hemodynamic factor associated with MCA aneurysm presence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?