Interim assessment of prospective phase II trial evaluating efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine for stage II / III gastric cancer after radical surgery

H. Ren,Xin Wang,H. Fang,Ning Li,J. Jin,Yueping Liu,Weihu Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2014.02.006
2014-03-15
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the preliminary efficacy and acute toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent capecitabine for stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ gastric cancer (AJCC 7th)after radical surgery and to decide whether to continue phase Ⅱ trial.Methods From 2009 to 2011,35 patients with gastric cancer (10 stage Ⅱ patients and 25 stage Ⅲ patients) were included in prospective phase Ⅱ trial to receive chemoradiotherapy.In radiotherapy,the patients received IMRT to the anastomosis,tumor bed,and regional lymph nodes at a dose of 45 Gy/25 fractions.In concurrent chemotherapy,the patients received capecitabine at 1 600 mg/m2 in two divided doses per day for 5 weeks; in adjuvant chemotherapy,the patients received fluorouracil or capecitabine ± oxaliplatin (4-8 cycles).The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates,and the log-rank test was used for univariate prognostic analysis.A disease-free survival (DFS) of 52.9% was used as the lower limit for continuing study.Results With a median follow-up of 21 months,the follow-up rate was 94%.Radiotherapy was not completed in 3 patients.The 2-year DFS and overall survival (OS) were 70% and 86%,respectively.The incidence rates of grade 3 acute gastrointestinal,hematologic,and overall toxicities were 11%,11%,and 26%,respectively.The prognostic analysis showed that signet-ring cell carcinoma and positive lymph node ratio were adverse prognostic factors for DFS,and advanced T stage (T4) was the adverse prognostic factor for OS.Conclusions The 2-year DFS was greater than 52.9% among all patients with gastric cancer who received IMRT with concurrent capecitabine after radical surgery,and the toxicities were tolerable.Thus,phase Ⅱ trial could be continued. Key words: Gastric neoplasms/surgery ;  Gastric neoplasms/chemoradiotherapy ;  Prognosis
Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?