Interim Analysis of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy with Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus Capecitabine Alone for Pathological Stage II and III Rectal Cancer: a Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial

Yan-Ru Feng,Yuan Zhu,Lu-Ying Liu,Wei-Hu Wang,Shu-Lian Wang,Yong-Wen Song,Xin Wang,Yuan Tang,Yue-Ping Liu,Hua Ren,Hui Fang,Shi-Ping Zhang,Xin-Fan Liu,Zi-Hao Yu,Ye-Xiong Li,Jing Jin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8226
2016-01-01
Oncotarget
Abstract:The aim of this study is to present an interim analysis of a phase III trial (NCT00714077) of postoperative concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy with or without oxaliplatin for pathological stage II and III rectal cancer.Patients with pathologically confirmed stage II and III rectal cancer were randomized to either radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine (Cap-RT group) or with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (Capox-RT group).The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival rate (DFS).The 3-year DFS rate was 73.9% in the Capox-RT group and 71.6% in the Cap-RT group (HR 0.92, p = 0.647), respectively.No significant difference was observed in overall survival, cumulative incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups (p > 0.05).More grade 3-4 acute toxicity was observed in the Capox-RT group than in the Cap-RT group (38.1% vs. 29.2%,p = 0.041).Inclusion of oxaliplatin in the capecitabine-based postoperative regimen did not improve DFS but increased toxicities for pathological stage II and III rectal cancer in this interim analysis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?