Abstract:ABSTRACT Using a CEO wealth decomposition method, I examine how each wealth component affects managerial incentives to raise external public funds. I find that the board compensation policy adjustment and CEO's own portfolio adjustment account for a larger proportion of total wealth change in issuance firms than in non-issuance firms; and larger in equity issuance firm than in bond issuance firm. I provide evidence that those adjustments serve to weaken the shareholder-manager interest alignment in that they are insignificantly or even negatively sensitive to shareholder returns. I also show these perceived wealth effects help explain a firm's ex ante financing choice. JEL Classifications: G32, G34, J33 Keywords: executive compensation; public financing; SEO; bond issuance I. INTRODUCTION The security issuance is essentially a capital structure decision. Literature has put forward the trade-off theory, pecking-order model, and market timing theory, etc. to model firm's financing decisions (Modigliani and Miller, 1958; Myers and Majluf, 1984; Baker and Wurgler, 2002). Those capital structure theories basically focus on the cost and benefit of the financing choice to a firm or the financial market conditions to explain the firm's optimal policy choice. Very few of them look at the firm's financing decision from the perspective of managerial incentives. Since a CEO plays a prominent role in corporate financing decisions, his compensation structure has important influences on the financing choice of the firm. The literature on the cross-sectional relationship between managerial incentives and financing decisions generally find mixed results. For example, Coles et al. (2006) find that higher risk-taking incentives (as measured by vega) from executive stock options encourage more aggressive debt policy. On the other hand, Lewellen (2006) incorporates the managerial risk aversion and undiversification and suggests that options discourage risk-taking and leverage. Datta et al. (2005) find that the market reacts more negatively to SEO announcements with high executive equity-based compensation. The result is interpreted as market perceives high manager-shareholder interest alignment as a clearer signal that the firm is issuing over-valued equity. Brzel and Webb (2006) support the same over-valuation story by documenting a negative relation between the proportion of CEO equity-based compensation and shareholder wealth changes following SEOs. Both papers use equity-based compensation grants prior to the issuance scaled by total compensation to measure interest alignment. However, it is well recognized that the alignment should be measured using the CEO's total portfolio holding. More importantly, given CEO's large portfolio holdings of stock and options, it is puzzling from these studies why a predictable decline in stock prices associated with an SEO would not deter a CEO from choosing an SEO. These contradictions in prior literature motivates me to conduct the event study on CEO wealth change upon a firm's public financing decision. I first decompose the effects of a major firm policy on CEO wealth. Specifically, the effect of a corporate action on CEO wealth consists of a pure price effect, board compensation effect, and CEO's own portfolio adjustment effect. The pure price effect is the effect of stock price moment on CEO's prior unadjusted portfolio holdings. Board compensation effect consists of two parts: standard compensation grant that preserve the value of prior year's grant level; and incremental grant that represents abnormal grant a CEO receives upon the change of board compensation policy following an event. CEO's own portfolio adjustment includes CEO's ex-ante and ex-post options/stocks adjustment around the corporate event. I empirically calculate the contribution of each wealth component to CEO total wealth change around a firm's public financing event. …

Behavioral and Rational Explanations of Stock Price Performance around SEOs: Evidence from a Decomposition of Market-to-Book Ratios

Equity Financing Incentive and Corporate Disclosure: New Causal Evidence from SEO Deregulation

R&D manipulation and SEO pricing in the Chinese capital market: The information effect of inefficient investment

The Post-issue Underperformance of Rights Issuers——Analysis Based on Information Asymmetry and Principal-Agent Theory

Stock hyping before auction-style SEOs: Are primary market investors misled?

Earnings Management, IPO Underpricing, and Post-Issue Stock Performance of Chinese SMEs

A Behavioral Signaling Explanation for Stock Splits: Evidence from China

Investor sentiment, disagreement and IPO puzzle in China’ s stock market

Stock Return or Sales Growth? Multiple Performance Feedback and Strategic Investments Under Securities Analysts’ Earnings Pressure

Executive Stock Option Exercise and Seasoned Equity Offerings

Influence of Media Coverage and Sentiment on Seasoned Equity Offerings.

Are SEO investors misled by analyst optimism bias? Evidence from investor bids in SEO auctions

The Effect of SEO on Equity Value under Dual-Class Ownership Structure——Research on Tradable Shares

Insider Trading in Reits: Evidence from Informed Stock Option Exercise Around Seasoned Equity Offerings

A rational finance explanation of the stock predictability puzzle

Investor Psychology and Misvaluation Comovement

Information Asymmetry and the Listed Companies' SEO Preference

Social Media Emotions and IPO Returns

SEO Performance Threshold and Earnings Management

Managerial Incentives and Corporate Financing Decisions

Reverse Mergers, Shell Value, and Regulation Risk in Chinese Equity Markets