Abstract:A widely accepted theory is challenged in this paper. Foreign firms’ pricing premium from listing in the US was considered as a result of better regulation and protection of minority shareholders of the listed companies. This paper raises another viewpoint that the regulation clauses may not have been implemented as well as people used to think. The information asymmetry between the US regulators and the overseas firms creates the possibility that illegal activities such as forging documents and faking financial reports may not be discovered in time, especially when listing is through a non-IPO way like reverse merger transactions. As a result, the de facto poorly performed foreign companies also have a chance to list in the US exchanges by exaggerating their business performance in balance sheets and profit from selling stocks to American investors in the secondary market as long as their improper behaviors are not perceived by the regulators before listing. Therefore in contrast to what the existing literature has assumed, there are two types of foreign firms traded on the NYSE, Nasdaq and Amex: good firms with growth opportunities and bad firms which cheat the investors. As investors realize the existence of the bad firms, the problem becomes similar to the market of lemons. Price of the foreign stocks from countries with more information asymmetry, poorer legal enforcement and corporate governance could go down and the cross-listing premium may disappear. This paper uses firm-level accounting data of the Chinese stocks listed in the US exchanges and listed in the four stock markets in mainland China to prove the above hypothesis. Cross-listing discount, instead of premium, is found. Tobin’s q premium from listing in the US has been decreasing from year 2006 when the Chinese firms’ accounting fraud was first reported and finally turned to be negative. The widely reported financial fraud of the US-listed Chinese firms after 2010 proves the correctness of the aforementioned two-type-firm theory. Accordingly, the US-listed Chinese firms with more information disclosure are higher valuated, including firms listed via IPO rather than reverse merger, firms from large Chinese cities with better legal enforcement and easier verification of information authenticity, and large firms which are covered by more analysts and media. As for the hypothesis that bad companies prefer exaggerating their performance in financial reports, the historical data does show that the already delisted companies reported a much higher 12-month trailing EPS before their delisting. Moreover, when there is less information asymmetry and more information disclosure, price of the US-listed Chinese stocks goes up.

Information Asymmetry and the Listed Companies' SEO Preference

An Explanation for the Listed Companies' SEO Preference: Free Cash Flow Approach

Equity Financing Incentive and Corporate Disclosure: New Causal Evidence from SEO Deregulation

Disproportionate Ownership Structure and IPO Long-Run Performance of Non-Soes in China

Leverage Ratio and Determinants of Capital Structure in SMEs: Evidence from China

Information Risk and Underwriter Switching in Seos: Evidence from China

Are SEO investors misled by analyst optimism bias? Evidence from investor bids in SEO auctions

R&D manipulation and SEO pricing in the Chinese capital market: The information effect of inefficient investment

The Design and Choice of Equity-selling Mechanisms under Information Asymmetry

Stock hyping before auction-style SEOs: Are primary market investors misled?

Impact of Entrenched Ultimate Owners’ Self-Dealing on SEO Methods Choice and Discounts of Private Placements––evidence from Listed Companies in China

Empirical Research on Seasoned Equity Offerings, Board Member Characteristics, and Corporate Investment Efficiency

Financing Constraints,expropriation of Minor Shareholders,and Abuse of SEO Proceeds

On Chinese Listed Companies' Financing Pecking Order Based on Information Asymmetry

Market Timing in Seasoned Equity Offerings with Security Issue Regulation and Its Impact on Capital Structure

The Post-issue Underperformance of Rights Issuers——Analysis Based on Information Asymmetry and Principal-Agent Theory

The Status Quo Of And The Reflections On The Information Disclosure Of Listed Companies In China

The Effect of SEO on Equity Value under Dual-Class Ownership Structure——Research on Tradable Shares

Are Foreign Companies Listed in the US Really Worth More? Information Asymmetry and Cross-listing Discount of China Concepts Stocks

Equity Financing Regulation and the Optimal Capital Structure: Evidence from China

Impact of SEO Behaviour of A-share Listed Companies on Value Creation