Abstract:The pecking order theory of corporate capital structure developed by states that issuing securities is subject to an adverse selection problem. Managers endowed with private information have incentives to issue overpriced risky securities. But they also understand that issuing such securities will result in a negative price reaction because rational investors, who are at an information disadvantage, will discount the prices of any risky securities the firm issues. Consequently, firms follow a pecking order: use internal resources when possible; if internal funds are inadequate, obtain external debt; external equity is the last resort. Large firms rely significantly on internal finance to meet their needs. External net debt issues finance the minor deficits that remain. Equity is not a significant source of financing for large firms. By contrast, small firms lack sufficient internal resources and obtain external finance. Although much of it is equity, there are substantial issues of debt by small firms. Firms are sorted into three portfolios based on whether they have a surplus or a deficit. About 15% of firm-year observations are in the surplus group. Firms primarily use surpluses to pay down debt. About 56% of firm-year observations are in the balance group. These firms generate internal cash flows that are just about enough to meet their investment and dividend needs. They issue debt, which is just enough to meet their debt repayments. They are relatively inactive in equity markets. About 29% of firm-year observations are in the deficit group. Deficits arise because of a combination of negative profitability and significant investments in both real and financial assets. Some financing patterns in the data are consistent with a pecking order: firms with moderate deficits favor debt issues; firms with very high deficits rely much more on equity than debt. Others are not: many equity-issuing firms do not seem to have entirely used up the debt capacity; some with a surplus issue equity. The theory suggests a sharp discontinuity in financing methods between surplus firms and deficit firms, and another at debt capacity. The literature provides little support for the predicted threshold effects. The theoretical work has shown that adverse selection does not necessarily lead to pecking order behavior. The pecking order is obtained only under special conditions. With both risky debt and equity being issued, there is often scope for many equilibria, and there is no clear basis for selecting among them. A pecking order may or may not emerge from the theory. Several articles show that the adverse selection problem can be solved by certain financing strategies or properly designed managerial contracts and can even disappear in dynamic models. Although adverse selection can generate a pecking order, it can also be caused by agency considerations, transaction costs, tax consideration, or behavioral decision-making considerations. Under standard tests in the literature, these alternative underlying motivations are commonly observationally equivalent.

On Chinese Listed Companies' Financing Pecking Order Based on Information Asymmetry

The Empirical Analysis of the Financing Pecking Order of Chinese Listed Companies

Leverage Ratio and Determinants of Capital Structure in SMEs: Evidence from China

Does Information Asymmetry Lead to Higher Debt Financing? Evidence from China During the NTS Reform Period

The Analysis on the Financing Preference in China’s Listed Corporations

Empirical Study of Corporate Financing: Seen from Information Asymmetry of Assets Risk

Research on Corporate Financing Decision Based on Heterogeneous Beliefs

The Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

The Explanation of Causes for the Equity Financing Preference of China's Listed Companies

A Re-Examination of the Capital Structure Theory: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

How Do Chinese Listed Companies Choose Financing Channel

An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Capital Structures of Chinese Publicly Listed Companies

Information Asymmetry and the Listed Companies' SEO Preference

The Design and Choice of Equity-selling Mechanisms under Information Asymmetry

The financing behaviour of listed Chinese firms

A Study of the Reasons for Stock Financing Preferences of Listed Companies in China

The Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure

The Equity Financing Mystery of Chinese and Western

An Empirical Analysis on the Financing Structure and its Changing Trends of Chinese Listed Companies

Capital Structure Choice in a Nascent Market: Evidence from Listed Firms in China

An Empirical Study on Financing Cost for Equity Financing Vs. Debt Financing of China's Listed Companies