Error Sources of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Satellites

Yen-Yi Wu,Austin Madson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020354
IF: 5
2024-01-17
Remote Sensing
Abstract:Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) processing techniques have been widely used to derive surface deformation or retrieve terrain elevation. Over the development of the past few decades, most research has mainly focused on its application, new techniques for improved accuracy, or the investigation of a particular error source and its correction method. Therefore, a thorough discussion about each error source and its influence on InSAR-derived products is rarely addressed. Additionally, InSAR is a challenging topic for beginners to learn due to the intricate mathematics and the necessary signal processing knowledge required to grasp the core concepts. This results in the fact that existing papers about InSAR are easy to understand for those with a technical background but difficult for those without. To cope with the two issues, this paper aims to provide an organized, comprehensive, and easily understandable review of the InSAR error budget. In order to assist readers of various backgrounds in comprehending the concepts, we describe the error sources in plain language, use the most fundamental math, offer clear examples, and exhibit numerical and visual comparisons. In this paper, InSAR-related errors are categorized as intrinsic height errors or location-induced errors. Intrinsic height errors are further divided into two subcategories (i.e., systematic and random error). These errors can result in an incorrect number of phase fringes and introduce unwanted phase noise into the output interferograms, respectively. Location-induced errors are the projection errors caused by the slant-ranging attribute of the SAR systems and include foreshortening, layover, and shadow effects. The main focus of this work is on systematic and random error, as well as their effects on InSAR-derived topographic and deformation products. Furthermore, because the effects of systematic and random errors are greatly dependent on radar wavelengths, different bands are utilized for comparison, including L-band, S-band, C-band, and X-band scenarios. As examples, we used the parameters of the upcoming NISAR operation to represent L-band and S-band, ERS-1 and Sentinel-1 to represent C-band, and TerraSAR-X to represent X-band. This paper seeks to bridge this knowledge gap by presenting an approachable exploration of InSAR error sources and their implications. This robust and accessible analysis of the InSAR error budget is especially pertinent as more SAR data products are made available (e.g., NISAR, ICEYE, Capella, Umbra, etc.) and the SAR user-base continues to expand. Finally, a commentary is offered to explore the error sources that were not included in this work, as well as to present our thoughts and conclusions.
environmental sciences,imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve The paper aims to solve the problem of error sources in Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) technology. Specifically, the paper attempts to solve the following two main problems: 1. **Comprehensive discussion of error sources and their impacts**: - Although in the past few decades, InSAR technology has made remarkable progress in applications, new methods to improve accuracy, and research on specific error sources, comprehensive and systematic discussions on each error source and its specific impact on InSAR - derived products are rare. Therefore, the paper aims to provide a well - organized, comprehensive, and easy - to - understand overview of InSAR error budgets. 2. **Improve beginners' understanding ability**: - InSAR is a complex field, and deep knowledge of mathematics and signal processing is required to master its core concepts. This makes existing InSAR literature difficult to understand for readers without a technical background. To meet this challenge, the paper uses approachable language, the most basic mathematical formulas, clear examples, and numerical and visual comparisons to describe error sources, so as to help readers with different backgrounds understand these concepts. ### Error classification The paper divides InSAR - related errors into two categories: 1. **Intrinsic Height Errors**: - Intrinsic height errors are caused by errors in height measurement. These errors are further divided into systematic errors and random errors. - **Systematic Errors**: Caused by systematic phase shifts in the coherent phase change, such as topographic phase, orbital phase, and atmospheric delay. - **Random Errors**: Noise caused by incoherent phase changes, such as scatterer phase offsets and surface movements. 2. **Location - Induced Errors**: - Location - induced errors are caused by the incorrect projection positions of actual terrain features in radar images. These errors include projection errors caused by slant - range properties, such as foreshortening, layover, and shadow effects. ### Specific error sources - **Systematic Errors**: - **Viewing Geometry**: Including flat - earth phase, orbital phase, and topographic phase. - **Propagation Path**: Including ionospheric advance, tropospheric delay, and liquid - water delay. - **Scatterer Motions**: Including scatterer phase offsets and surface movements. - **Random Errors**: - Mainly noise caused by incoherent phase changes, such as scatterer phase offsets and surface movements. ### Main contributions of the paper - **Systematic classification**: The paper proposes a new classification system, which divides error sources into intrinsic height errors and location - induced errors, and further divides intrinsic height errors into systematic errors and random errors. - **Simplified concepts**: By using approachable language and basic mathematical formulas, beginners can more easily understand InSAR error sources. - **Multi - band comparison**: The paper uses data of different bands (L - band, S - band, C - band, X - band) for comparison, showing how the wavelength affects the effect of each error source. In summary, the paper aims to fill the gap in the lack of systematic discussion of InSAR error sources in existing literature and provide an easy - to - understand entry point for beginners.