Abstract:Urban Studies, Ahead of Print. Cities are so complex that we constantly build models to represent them, understand them and attempt to plan them. Models represent a middle ground between the singular configurations of cities and universal theories. This is what makes them valuable and prone to circulate (between places, institutions and languages) and evolve to adapt to new ideas, local conditions and/or other models. When it comes to analytical urban models (i.e. analytical representations of cities developed to study or simulate part of their structure or dynamics), there is a lack of academic understanding regarding how context and circulation affect their content, use and interpretation. What happens to analytical urban models and their reception during their circulation across geographical and disciplinary boundaries? How have different academic disciplines interacted with, contributed to and been influenced by analytical urban models? What are the consequences of urban models' mobility for our understanding of cities? In this article, we employ the policy mobilities framework to analyse the circulation of analytical urban models. We use six canonical models as case studies to determine how their assumptions came about and how these models have circulated across different domains of policy and application by using biographical information and model analysis. The first contribution of the article is to demonstrate by example that our hypothesis regarding the influence of context is consistent. We also show that highly transferable/mobile models share common characteristics relating to contingent factors such as their creators' biographies, institutional context and the traditional markers of power relations.

On the contents and agents of commentary in modelling

Economic models and their flexible interpretations: a philosophy of science perspective

Economic models as argumentative devices

Insider apology for microeconomic theorising?

Commentary on Teaching Economics with Podcasts, Literature and Movies

A CRITIQUE ON ECONOMIC MODELING:CONCLUSIONS LOGICALLY IMPLIED IN THE BASIC ASSUMPTIONS——A View on the Problems in the Process of Economic Modeling from the Truth That Different Results Are Induced by the Same Utility Function

An Interdisciplinary Model for Macroeconomics

'Let me tell you a story': the politics of macroeconomic models

Studying economic complexity with agent-based models: advances, challenges and future perspectives

Reflections on Econometric Modeling Methodology

A Comment on a Studying Model for Environmental Sociology

Commentary on Antosz et al. (2023): The role of macro-micro-macro frameworks and critical realism in agent-based modelling

The Method Innovation of Systematic Analysis Model in Technical Economics Research

Agent-based and macroscopic modeling of the complex socio-economic systems

Socioeconomic agents as active matter in nonequilibrium Sakoda-Schelling models

Models Of and Models For: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Biology

Commentary on Coulter et al. 2019 ‘Attaining Theoretical Coherence Within Relationship-Based Practice in Child and Family Social Work: The Systemic Perspective’

The role of analytical models and their circulation in urban studies and policy

Commentary: Beyond Morgan’s eight metaphors

Comment on An and Schorfheide's Bayesian Analysis of DSGE Models