Abstract:Successful liver transplantation in a child is often a hard-won victory, requiring all the combined expertise of a dedicated pediatric transplant team. This article outlines the considerable challenges still facing pediatric liver transplant physicians and surgeons. In looking to the future, where should priorities lie to enhance the success already achieved? First, solutions to the donor shortage must be sought aggressively by increasing the use of from split-liver transplants, judicious application of living-donor programs, and increasing the donation rate, perhaps by innovative means. The major immunologic barriers, to successful xenotransplantation make it unlikely that this option will be tenable in the near future. Second, current immunosuppression is nonspecific, toxic, and unable to be individually adjusted to the patient's immune response. The goal of achieving donor-specific tolerance will require new consideration of induction protocols. Developing a clinically applicable method to measure the recipient's immunoreactivity is of paramount importance, for future studies of new immunosuppressive strategies and to address the immediate concern of long-term over-immunosuppression. The inclusion of pediatric patients in new protocols will require the ongoing insistence of pediatric transplant investigators. Third, the current immunosuppressive drugs have a long-term morbidity and mortality of their own. These long-term effects are particularly important in children who may well have decades of exposure to these therapies. There is now some understanding of their long-term renal toxicity and the risk of malignancy. New drugs may obviate renal toxicity, whereas the risk of malignancy is inherent in any nonspecific immunosuppressive regimen. Although progress is being made in preventing and recognizing PTLD, this entity remains an important ongoing concern. The global effect of long-term immunosuppression on the child's growth, development, and intellectual potential is unknown. Of particular concern is the potential for neurotoxicity from the calcineurin inhibitors. Fourth, recurrent disease and new diseases, perhaps potentiated by immunosuppressive drugs, must be considered. Already the recurrence of autoimmune disease and cryptogenic cirrhosis have been documented in pediatric patients. Now, a new lesion, a nonspecific hepatitis, sometimes with positive autoimmune markers, that may progress to cirrhosis has been recognized. It is not known whether this entity is an unusual form of rejection, an unrecognized viral infection, or a response to immunosuppressive drugs themselves. Finally, pediatric transplant recipients, like any other children, must be protected and nourished physically and mentally if they are to fulfill their potential. After liver transplantation the child's growth, intellectual functioning, and psychologic adaptation may all require special attention from parents, teachers, and physicians alike. There is limited understanding of how the enormous physical intervention of a liver transplantation affects a child's cognitive and psychologic function as the child progresses through life. The persons caring for these children have the difficult responsibility of providing services to evaluate these essential measures of children's health over the long term and to intervene if necessary. Part of the transplant physician's our duty to protect and advocate for children is to fight for equal access to health care. In most of the developing world, economic pressures make it impossible to consider liver transplantation a health care priority. In the United States and in other countries with the medical infrastructure to support liver transplantation, however, health care professionals must strive to be sure that the policies governing candidacy for transplantation and allocation of organs are applied justly and uniformly to all children whose lives are threatened by liver disease. In the current regulatory climate that increasingly takes medical decisions out of the hands of physicians, pediatricians must be even more prepared to protect the unique and often complicated needs of children both before and after transplantation. Only in this way can the challenges of the present and the future be met.

Pushing the Limits of In Situ Split Liver Procurement to Overcome Donor Distance and Graft Size Challenges for 8‐Week‐Old Pediatric Recipient

Application of Pediatric Donors in Split Liver Transplantation: is There an Age Limit?

Split Liver Transplantation and Pediatric Waitlist Mortality in the United States: Potential for Improvement

Frequency of Whole-Organ in Lieu of Split-Liver Transplantation over the Last Decade: Children Experienced Increased Wait Time and Death

Split Liver Transplantation: a Reliable Approach to Expand Donor Pool.

Application of Pediatric Donation after Brain Death Donors During Split Liver Transplantation: an Analysis of 8 Cases

Utility of neonatal donors in pediatric liver transplantation: A single-center experience.

Pediatric kidney transplantation, a technical update

Clinical research of deceased-donor split liver transplantation in pediatric recipients

Optimizing pediatric liver transplantation: Evaluating the impact of donor age and graft type on patient survival outcome

Application of liver graft from little-month-old donors in liver transplantation for children

Influence of graft size matching on outcomes of infantile living donor liver transplantation

Pediatric Living-Donor Liver Transplantation Using Right Posterior Segment Grafts

Impact of donor age on short-term outcomes after pediatric split liver transplantation

Liver transplantation in children using organs from young paediatric donors.

Outcome of split-liver transplantation from pediatric donors weighing 25 kg or less

Thirty-Five Consecutive Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Experiences and Lessons Learned from A Single Center

Feasibility and Safety of Using Low-Body-weight Donors in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

En Bloc Kidneys Transplanted From Infant Donors Less Than 5 Kg Into Pediatric Recipients

Liver transplantation. The pediatric challenge

Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes Achieved With Live Donor and Split Deceased Donor Liver Grafts in Pediatric Liver Transplantation