Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes Achieved With Live Donor and Split Deceased Donor Liver Grafts in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Louise Barbier,Charlotte Hitchins,Peter Carr‐Boyd,Helen M. Evans,John McCall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14843
2024-08-22
Pediatric Transplantation
Abstract:Left lobe split deceased grafts can achieve the same outcomes as live donor grafts and should be considered in an intention‐to‐split policy to decrease time on the waiting list for young children when a live donor is not available. Background The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of pediatric LT with left liver grafts, obtained either from a living donor (LD) or a split deceased donor (sDD). Methods Retrospective single‐center study from 2002 to 2022. All pediatric LT with left liver grafts (not including middle hepatic vein) from LD or sDD were included. Reduced grafts were not included. Results A total of 112 pediatric LT were performed: 58 with LD grafts and 54 with sDD grafts (17 split ex situ and 37 in situ). Donor characteristics were similar, apart from donor age (33 years in LD vs. 30 years in sDD, p = 0.03). Indications were similar with 55% biliary atresia in each group. Retransplantation was more frequently performed in the sDD group (2% vs. 15%, p = 0.01). Recipient age, weight, and PELD score at transplant were not significantly different between groups. Cold ischemia time was longer for sDD (158 min in LD vs. 390 min in sDD; p
pediatrics,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?