Reducing negative economic and equity implications associated with conserving 30% of the planet by 2030

Sophie Jago
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2024.01.004
IF: 5.652
2024-02-07
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Abstract:Highlights • Expanding protected areas is likely to have high economic costs and exacerbate inequalities. • OECMs can provide a cheaper more equitable alternative to meeting area-based conservation targets. • Effort and funds should focus on improving existing protected areas and designating new OECMs. A key target for reducing biodiversity loss, outlined in the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, is to protect 30% of the planet by 2030 (30×30) in protected areas (PAs) and 'other effective area-based conservation measures' (OECMs). There is concern that focusing on expanding PAs could exacerbate existing inequalities and that this may not be a cost-effective means to conserve biodiversity. There is already a lack of funding for existing PAs with many ineffectively managed. OECMs offer a potential solution to reach area-based protection targets in a more economically feasible and equitable way. The focus for 30×30 should be on improving the effectiveness of existing PAs and recognising existing areas that are providing conservation benefits as OECMs. Graphical abstract Download : Download high-res image (142KB) Download : Download full-size image
biodiversity conservation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?