Abstract:After their failure to achieve a significant reduction in the global rate of biodiversity loss by 2010, world governments adopted 20 new ambitious Aichi biodiversity targets to be met by 2020. Efforts to achieve one particular target can contribute to achieving others, but different targets may sometimes require conflicting solutions. Consequently, lack of strategic thinking might result, once again, in a failure to achieve global commitments to biodiversity conservation. We illustrate this dilemma by focusing on Aichi Target 11. This target requires an expansion of terrestrial protected area coverage, which could also contribute to reducing the loss of natural habitats (Target 5), reducing human-induced species decline and extinction (Target 12), and maintaining global carbon stocks (Target 15). We considered the potential impact of expanding protected areas to mitigate global deforestation and the consequences for the distribution of suitable habitat for >10,000 species of forest vertebrates (amphibians, birds, and mammals). We first identified places where deforestation might have the highest impact on remaining forests and then identified places where deforestation might have the highest impact on forest vertebrates (considering aggregate suitable habitat for species). Expanding protected areas toward locations with the highest deforestation rates (Target 5) or the highest potential loss of aggregate species' suitable habitat (Target 12) resulted in partially different protected area network configurations (overlapping with each other by about 73%). Moreover, the latter approach contributed to safeguarding about 30% more global carbon stocks than the former. Further investigation of synergies and trade-offs between targets would shed light on these and other complex interactions, such as the interaction between reducing overexploitation of natural resources (Targets 6, 7), controlling invasive alien species (Target 9), and preventing extinctions of native species (Target 12). Synergies between targets must be identified and secured soon and trade-offs must be minimized before the options for co-benefits are reduced by human pressures.

Challenges beyond reaching a 30% of area protection

Scaling up area-based conservation to implement the Global Biodiversity Framework's 30x30 target: The role of Nature's Strongholds

Realizing "30 × 30" in India: The potential, the challenges, and the way forward

Reducing negative economic and equity implications associated with conserving 30% of the planet by 2030

Progress toward Equitably Managed Protected Areas in Aichi Target 11: A Global Survey

Closing staffing gaps in Madagascar's protected areas to achieve the 30 by 30 conservation target

Integrating multi-objective optimization and ecological connectivity to strengthen Peru's protected area system towards the 30*2030 target

Ocean protection quality is lagging behind quantity: Applying a scientific framework to assess real marine protected area progress against the 30 by 30 target

Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century

Challenges and opportunities of area-based conservation in reaching biodiversity and sustainability goals

Author Correction: Vulnerabilities of Protected Lands in the Face of Climate and Human Footprint Changes

Climate and land-use changes reduce the benefits of terrestrial protected areas

Mobile apps for 30×30 equity

Synergies and trade-offs in achieving global biodiversity targets

Little progress in ecoregion representation in the last decade of terrestrial and marine protected area expansion leaves substantial tasks ahead

How to go forward and beyond: Future tasks of China's protected areas system

The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities

Aligning adaptation and sustainability agendas: lessons from protected areas

Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales

The role of privately protected areas in achieving biodiversity representation within a national protected area network

Amphibian conservation, land-use changes and protected areas: A global overview